both because of its age, thirteenth
century, and because of the correction in the text, and which
appears to have escaped the researches of the students of the
Franciscans, is the one owned by the Ecole de Medicine at
Montpellier, No. 30, in vellum folio: _Passionale vetus ecclesiae
S. Benigni divionensis_. The story of Celano occupies in it the
fos. 257a-271b. The text ends abruptly in the middle of
paragraph 112 with _supiriis ostendebant_. Except for this final
break it is complete. Cf. Archives Pertz, t. vii., pp. 195 and
196. Vide General catalogue of the manuscripts of the public
libraries of the departments, t. i., p. 295.
[8] Vide 1 Cel., Prol. _Jubente domino et glorioso Papa
Gregorio_. Celano wrote it after the canonization (July 16,
1228) and before February 25, 1229, for the date indicated above
raises no difficulty.
[9] 1 Cel., 56. Perhaps he was the son of that Thomas, Count of
Celano, to whom Ryccardi di S. Germano so often made allusion in
his chronicle: 1219-1223. See also two letters of Frederick II.
to Honorius III., on April 24 and 25, 1223, published in
Winckelmann: _Acta imperii inedita_, t. i., p. 232.
[10] Giord., 19.
[11] Giord., 30 and 31.
[12] Giord., 59. Cf. Glassberger, ann. 1230. The question
whether he is the author of the _Dies irae_ would be out of place
here.
[13] This is so true that the majority of historians have been
brought to believe in two generalates of Elias, one in
1227-1230, the other in 1236-1239. The letter _Non ex odio_ of
Frederick II. (1239) gives the same idea: _Revera papa iste
quemdam religiosum et timoratum fratrem Helyam, ministrum
ordinis fratrum minorum ab ipso beato Francisco patre ordinis
migrationis suae tempore constitutum ... in odium nostrum ...
deposuit_. Huillard-Breholles: _Hist. dipl. Fred. II._, t. v.,
p. 346.
[14] He is named only once, 1 Cel., 48.
[15] 1 Cel., 95, 98, 105, 109. The account of the Benediction is
especially significant. _Super quem inquit (Franciscus) tenes
dexteram meam? Super fratrem Heliam, inquiunt. Et ego sic volo,
sit...._ 1 Cel., 108. Those last words obviously disclose the
intention. Cf. 2 Cel., 3, 139.
[16] 1 Cel., 102; cf. 91 and 109. Brother Leo is not even named
|