FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376  
377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   >>  
f his predecessors, had often abridged them,[41] and himself desired to preserve them in their original bloom. Better situated than any one for such a work, since he had at his disposal the archives of the Sacro Convento of Assisi, it may be said that he has omitted nothing of importance and that he has brought into his work considerable pieces from nearly all the legends which appeared in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries; they are there only in fragments, it is true, but with perfect accuracy.[42] When his researches were unsuccessful he avows it simply, without attempting to fill out the written testimonies with his own conjectures.[43] He goes farther, and submits the documents he has before him to a real testing, laying aside those he considers uncertain.[44] Finally he takes pains to point out the passages in which his only authority is oral testimony.[45] As he is almost continually citing the legends of Celano, the Three Companions, and Bonaventura, and as the citations prove on verification to be literally accurate, as well as those of the Will, the divers Rules, or the pontifical bulls, it seems natural to conclude that he was equally accurate with the citations which we cannot verify, and in which we find long extracts from works that have disappeared.[46] The citations which he makes from Celano present no difficulty; they are all accurate, corresponding sometimes with the First sometimes with the Second Legend.[47] Those from the Legend of the Three Companions are accurate, but it appears that Bartolommeo drew them from a text somewhat different from that which we have.[48] With the citations from the _Legenda Antiqua_ the question is complicated and becomes a nice one. Was there a work of this name? Certain authors, and among them the Bollandist Suysken, seem to incline toward the negative, and believe that to cite the _Legenda Antiqua_ is about the same as to refer vaguely to tradition. Others among contemporaries have thought that after the approbation and definitive adoption of Bonaventura's _Legenda Major_ by the Order the Legends anterior to that, and especially that of Celano, were called _Legenda Antiqua_. The Conformities permit us to look a little closer into the question. We find, in fact, passages from the _Legenda Antiqua_ which reproduce Celano's First Life.[49] Others present points of contact with the Second, sometimes a literary exactitude,[50] but often these are the same
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376  
377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   >>  



Top keywords:

Legenda

 

Celano

 
citations
 

accurate

 

Antiqua

 

Others

 
question
 
legends
 

passages

 

Second


Legend
 
Companions
 
Bonaventura
 

present

 

equally

 

complicated

 
natural
 

Bartolommeo

 

conclude

 

disappeared


difficulty

 

verify

 

extracts

 

appears

 

permit

 

Conformities

 

called

 

Legends

 

anterior

 

closer


literary

 

exactitude

 

contact

 

points

 

reproduce

 
adoption
 
Suysken
 

incline

 

Bollandist

 

authors


Certain
 
negative
 

thought

 

approbation

 

definitive

 

contemporaries

 
tradition
 

vaguely

 
considerable
 

pieces