Askew, 1906, p. 113: Briefs and
references.--Askew, 1911, p. 110: Briefs.

=Independent Labour party and Liberal party.=

Askew, 1906, p. 115: Briefs and references.--Askew, 1911, p. 112:
Briefs.

=Indeterminate sentence.=

Indeterminate sentences for the professional criminal. Askew, 1911, p.
113: Briefs.

=India.= Civil service. _See_ =Civil service.= India.

=India.= English rule.

Indian defence--a forward policy. Askew, 1906, p. 118: Briefs and
references.

Is English rule in India, considered as to its character and results,
capable of vindication? Has English rule been a benefit to India?
Matson, p. 191: Briefs and references.

Ought we to govern India solely for its natives? Gibson, p. 117: Briefs
and references.

=India.= Home rule.

India; home rule. Askew, 1906, p. 117: Briefs and references.--Askew,
1911, p. 114: Briefs.

=Indians of North America.=

Should the government make the education of the Indian compulsory? C. L.
of P. Reference lists.

=Individual and state.= _See_ =State and individual.=

=Individualism.=

Askew, 1906, p. 119: Briefs and references.--Askew, 1911, p. 115:
Briefs.

=Inductive reasoning.=

Is inductive reasoning the best method of arriving at truth? Has the
relative importance of inductive reasoning as a method of arriving at
truth been overrated in modern times? Matson, p. 441: Briefs and
references.

=Inheritance tax.=

Death duties (English), Graduated. Askew, 1906, p. 59: Briefs and
references.--Askew, 1911, p. 51: Briefs.

A progressive inheritance tax should be levied by the federal
government, constitutionality conceded. Pearson, p. 141: Briefs and
references.--Speaker, v. 2, p. 389: Briefs.--Wisconsin University, no.
385: Arguments and references.--C. L. of P. Debates: References.

=Initiative and referendum.= _See_ =Referendum.=

=Injunctions.=

The attitude of the federal courts toward the use of the writ of
injunction, as indicated by the Bucks Stove & Range Company decision,
is conducive to the best interests of the people of the United States
(all question of constitutionality eliminated). Pearson, p. 129:
Synopses of speeches, and references.

Federal courts should be prohibited from issuing injunctions in
controversies between labor and capital. Thomas, p. 188: Briefs.

Issuing of injunctions by federal courts in labor disputes should be
forbidden by Congress. Ringwalt, p. 219: Briefs and references.--Speaker,
v. 4, p. 108: Briefs