FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
francs, and build ourselves a fortress a few miles further back, somewhere about Falkenberg or Saarbrueck--there must be some suitable spot thereabouts. We should thus make a clear profit of 200,000,000 francs. [N.B.--A milliard = 1,000,000,000 francs.] I do not like so many Frenchmen being in our house against their will. It is just the same with Belfort. It is all French there too. The military men, however, will not be willing to let Metz slip, and perhaps they are right[59]. [Footnote 59: Busch, _Bismarck in the Franco-German War_, vol. ii. p. 341.] A sharp difference of opinion had arisen between Bismarck and Moltke on this question, and the Emperor Wilhelm intervened in favour of Moltke. That decided the question of Metz against Thiers despite his threat that this might lead to a renewal of war. For Belfort, however, the French statesman made a supreme effort. That fortress holds a most important position. Strong in itself, it stands as sentinel guarding the gap of nearly level ground between the spurs of the Vosges and those of the Jura. If that virgin stronghold were handed over to Germany, she would easily be able to pour her legions down the valley of the Doubs and dominate the rich districts of Burgundy and the Lyonnais. Besides, military honour required France to keep a fortress that had kept the tricolour flying. Metz the Germans held, and it was impossible to turn them out. Obviously the case of Belfort was on a different footing. In his conference of February 24, Thiers at last defied Bismarck in these words: "No; I will never yield Belfort and Metz in the same breath. You wish to ruin France in her finances, in her frontiers. Well! Take her. Conduct her administration, collect her revenues, and you will have to govern her in the face of Europe--if Europe permits[60]." [Footnote 60: G. Hanotaux, _Contemporary France_, vol i. p. 124 (Eng. edit.). This work is the most detailed and authoritative that has yet appeared on these topics. See, too, M. Samuel Denis' work, _Histoire Contemporaine_.] Probably this defiance had less weight with the Iron Chancellor than his conviction, noticed above, that to bring two entirely French towns within the German Empire would prove a source of weakness; beside which his own motto, _Beati possidentes_, told with effect in the case of Belfort. That stronghold was accordingly saved for France. Thiers also obtained a reduction
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Belfort
 

France

 
fortress
 

Thiers

 
Bismarck
 
francs
 
French
 

military

 

Europe

 

stronghold


Moltke

 

question

 

German

 

Footnote

 

administration

 

finances

 

Conduct

 

revenues

 

frontiers

 

collect


Germans

 

impossible

 

flying

 

tricolour

 
Besides
 
Lyonnais
 

honour

 

required

 

Obviously

 

govern


breath

 
defied
 
footing
 

conference

 

February

 

Empire

 

weakness

 

source

 

conviction

 
noticed

obtained
 
reduction
 

effect

 

possidentes

 
Chancellor
 

Burgundy

 

detailed

 

authoritative

 

permits

 
Hanotaux