FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   >>  
ssia and France in a declaration of our resolve to join them in case of war[560]. But (1) no British Minister is justified in committing his country to such a course of action. (2) The terms of the Ententes did not warrant it. (3) A menace to Germany and Austria would, by the terms of the Triple Alliance, have compelled Italy to join them, and it was clearly the aim of the British Government to avert such a disaster. (4) On July 30 and 31 Grey declared plainly to Germany that she must not count on our neutrality in all cases, and that a Franco-German War (quite apart from the question of Belgium) would probably draw us in[561]. [Footnote 560: British White Paper, Nos. 6, 24, 99; Russian Orange Book, No. 17.] [Footnote 561: British White Paper, Nos. 101, 102, 111, 114, 119. I dissent from Mr. F.S. Oliver (_Ordeal by Battle,_ pp. 30-34) on the question discussed above. For other arguments, see my _Origins of the War,_ pp. 167-9. The ties binding Roumania to Germany and Austria were looser; but anything of the nature of a general threat to the Central Powers would probably have ranged her too on their side.] Sir Edward is also charged with not making our intentions clear as to what would happen in case of the violation of the neutrality of Belgium. But he demanded, both from France and Germany, assurances that they would respect that neutrality; and on August 1 he informed the German ambassador in London of our "very great regret" at the ambiguity of the German reply. Also, on August 2 the German ambassador at Brussels protested that Belgium was quite safe so far as concerned Germany[562]. When a great Power gives those assurances, it does not improve matters to threaten her with war if she breaks them. She broke them on August 3; whereupon Grey took the decided action which Haldane had declared in 1912 that we would take. The clamour raised in Germany as to our intervention being unexpected is probably the result of blind adherence to a preconceived theory and of rage at a "decadent" nation daring to oppose an "invincible" nation. The German Government of course knew the truth, but its education of public opinion through the Press had become a fine art. Therefore, at the beginning of the war all Germans believed that France was about to invade Belgium, whereupon they stepped in to save her; that the Eastern Colossus had precipitated the war by its causeless mobilisation (a falsehood which ranged nearly all German So
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   >>  



Top keywords:

Germany

 

German

 

British

 
Belgium
 

neutrality

 

France

 

August

 
declared
 
nation
 

question


Government

 

Footnote

 

action

 

assurances

 

ambassador

 
Austria
 

ranged

 

threaten

 

matters

 

improve


breaks

 

demanded

 

decided

 

Brussels

 
respect
 

ambiguity

 

informed

 
London
 
regret
 

protested


concerned
 

Therefore

 

beginning

 

public

 

opinion

 

Germans

 
believed
 

Colossus

 

precipitated

 
causeless

mobilisation

 

Eastern

 

invade

 
stepped
 

falsehood

 

education

 

unexpected

 

result

 

intervention

 
raised