FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>   >|  
exposure to steam killed the plant (carrot) and abolished the response. Vibrational stimulus of 30 deg. applied at intervals of one minute; vertical line = .1 volt.] It will thus be seen that those modifications of vital activity which are produced in plants by temperature variation can be very accurately gauged by electric response. Indeed it may be said that there is no other method by which the moment of cessation of vitality can be so satisfactorily distinguished. Ordinarily, we are able to judge that a plant has died, only after various indirect effects of death, such as withering, have begun to appear. But in the electric response we have an immediate indication of the arrest of vitality, and we are thereby enabled to determine the death-point, which it is impossible to do by any other means. It may be mentioned here that the explanation suggested by Kunkel, of the response being due to movement of water in the plant, is inadequate. For in that case we should expect a definite stimulation to be under all conditions followed by a definite electric response, whose intensity and sign should remain invariable. But we find, instead, the response to be profoundly modified by any influence which affects the vitality of the plant. For instance, the response is at its maximum at an optimum temperature, a rise of a few degrees producing a profound depression; the response disappears at the maximum and minimum temperatures, and is revived when brought back to the optimum. Anaesthetics and poisons abolish the response. Again, we have the response undergoing an actual reversal when the tissue is stale. All these facts show that mere movement of water could not be the effective cause of plant response. CHAPTER IX PLANT RESPONSE--EFFECT OF ANAESTHETICS AND POISONS Effect of anaesthetics, a test of vital character of response--Effect of chloroform--Effect of chloral--Effect of formalin--Method in which response is unaffected by variation of resistance--Advantage of block method--Effect of dose. The most important test by which vital phenomena are distinguished is the influence on response of narcotics and poisons. For example, a nerve when narcotised by chloroform exhibits a diminishing response as the action of the anaesthetic proceeds. (See below, fig. 43.) Similarly, various poisons have the effect of permanently abolishing all response. Thus a nerve is killed by strong alkalis and stro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72  
73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
response
 

Effect

 

poisons

 

electric

 

vitality

 

method

 
distinguished
 

movement

 

maximum

 
influence

optimum

 

chloroform

 

definite

 

variation

 
temperature
 

killed

 

effective

 
ANAESTHETICS
 

EFFECT

 

RESPONSE


CHAPTER

 

tissue

 
reversal
 

disappears

 

minimum

 

temperatures

 
depression
 

profound

 
degrees
 
producing

revived

 

Vibrational

 

undergoing

 

actual

 

abolish

 

abolished

 

brought

 

Anaesthetics

 

POISONS

 
carrot

action
 

anaesthetic

 

proceeds

 

diminishing

 
exhibits
 

exposure

 

narcotised

 
permanently
 

strong

 

abolishing