FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  
are the common subjects of our thought and reasoning, and generally arise from some principle of union among our simple ideas. These complex ideas may be resolved into _relations_, _modes_, and _substances_."--(_Ibid._) In the next section, which is devoted to _Relations_, they are spoken of as qualities "by which two ideas are connected together in the imagination," or "which make objects admit of comparison," and seven kinds of relation are enumerated, namely, _resemblance_, _identity_, _space and time_, _quantity or number_, _degrees of quality_, _contrariety_, and _cause and effect_. To the reader of Hume, whose conceptions are usually so clear, definite, and consistent, it is as unsatisfactory as it is surprising to meet with so much questionable and obscure phraseology in a small space. One and the same thing, for example, resemblance, is first called a "quality of an idea," and secondly a "complex idea." Surely it cannot be both. Ideas which have the qualities of "resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect," are said to "attract one another" (save the mark!), and so become associated; though, in a subsequent part of the _Treatise_, Hume's great effort is to prove that the relation of cause and effect is a particular case of the process of association; that is to say, is a result of the process of which it is supposed to be the cause. Moreover, since, as Hume is never weary of reminding his readers, there is nothing in ideas save copies of impressions, the qualities of resemblance, contiguity, and so on, in the idea, must have existed in the impression of which that idea is a copy; and therefore they must be either sensations or emotions--from both of which classes they are excluded. In fact, in one place, Hume himself has an insight into the real nature of relations. Speaking of equality, in the sense of a relation of quantity, he says-- "Since equality is a relation, it is not, strictly speaking, a property in the figures themselves, but arises merely from the comparison which the mind makes between them."--(I. p. 70.) That is to say, when two impressions of equal figures are present, there arises in the mind a _tertium quid_, which is the perception of equality. On his own principles, Hume should therefore have placed this "perception" among the ideas of reflection. However, as we have seen, he expressly excludes everything but the emotions and the passions from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
resemblance
 

relation

 

effect

 
qualities
 

equality

 

figures

 
arises
 

comparison

 

quantity

 
emotions

contiguity

 

process

 

impressions

 
quality
 
relations
 

perception

 

complex

 

passions

 
copies
 

association


impression

 

reflection

 

existed

 

reminding

 

supposed

 

Moreover

 

excludes

 

expressly

 

However

 

sensations


readers

 

result

 
excluded
 

property

 

speaking

 
strictly
 

present

 

tertium

 

classes

 

insight


nature

 

Speaking

 
principles
 

Surely

 

objects

 
imagination
 

spoken

 
connected
 
degrees
 
contrariety