FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383  
384   385   386   >>  
ly the two theories postulate two very different conceptions of the fire which plays the principal part in the rites. On the one view, the fire, like sunshine in our latitude, is a genial creative power which fosters the growth of plants and the development of all that makes for health and happiness; on the other view, the fire is a fierce destructive power which blasts and consumes all the noxious elements, whether spiritual or material, that menace the life of men, of animals, and of plants. According to the one theory the fire is a stimulant, according to the other it is a disinfectant; on the one view its virtue is positive, on the other it is negative. [The two explanations are perhaps not mutually exclusive.] Yet the two explanations, different as they are in the character which they attribute to the fire, are perhaps not wholly irreconcilable. If we assume that the fires kindled at these festivals were primarily intended to imitate the sun's light and heat, may we not regard the purificatory and disinfecting qualities, which popular opinion certainly appears to have ascribed to them, as attributes derived directly from the purificatory and disinfecting qualities of sunshine? In this way we might conclude that, while the imitation of sunshine in these ceremonies was primary and original, the purification attributed to them was secondary and derivative. Such a conclusion, occupying an intermediate position between the two opposing theories and recognizing an element of truth in both of them, was adopted by me in earlier editions of this work;[801] but in the meantime Dr. Westermarck has argued powerfully in favour of the purificatory theory alone, and I am bound to say that his arguments carry great weight, and that on a fuller review of the facts the balance of evidence seems to me to incline decidedly in his favour. However, the case is not so clear as to justify us in dismissing the solar theory without discussion, and accordingly I propose to adduce the considerations which tell for it before proceeding to notice those which tell against it. A theory which had the support of so learned and sagacious an investigator as W. Mannhardt is entitled to a respectful hearing. Sec. 2. _The Solar Theory of the Fire-festivals_ [Theory that the fire-festivals are charms to ensure a supply of sunshine.] In an earlier part of this work we saw that savages resort to charms for making sunshine,[802] and it would b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383  
384   385   386   >>  



Top keywords:

sunshine

 

theory

 
festivals
 

purificatory

 

earlier

 

explanations

 
qualities
 
disinfecting
 

favour

 

plants


Theory
 
theories
 
charms
 

evidence

 

balance

 

weight

 
arguments
 

review

 

fuller

 

argued


adopted

 

element

 

recognizing

 

intermediate

 

position

 

opposing

 

editions

 

powerfully

 

Westermarck

 

meantime


respectful

 

hearing

 

entitled

 

Mannhardt

 

learned

 
sagacious
 
investigator
 

making

 

resort

 

savages


ensure
 
supply
 

support

 

dismissing

 

justify

 

decidedly

 
However
 

discussion

 
notice
 

proceeding