FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434  
435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   >>   >|  
at he should have omitted at the close all salutations. To account for this various hypotheses have been proposed. The words "_in Ephesus_" are omitted in the Sinai and Vatican manuscripts, and there is reason for believing that they were wanting in some other ancient manuscripts not now extant. See the quotations from Basil the Great, and other fathers in Alford, Ellicott, Meyer, and other critical commentators. On this ground some have supposed that the present epistle was intended to be _encyclical_--an epistle for general circulation among the churches; others, that it is the _Laodicean epistle_ referred to in Col. 4:16. But in favor of the words "in Ephesus" there is an overwhelming weight of evidence. They are sustained by all the versions and all the manuscripts except the above. Besides, as every Greek scholar knows, if these words are omitted, it compels the omission from the original of the two preceding words which are found in every manuscript and version--unless, indeed, we adopt the far-fetched hypothesis that the apostle furnished Tychicus with two or more copies of the epistle for different churches, leaving a _blank space_ to be filled as occasion should require; and then it becomes impossible to explain how the reading "in Ephesus" should have been so universal in the manuscripts and versions. There is no occasion for any of this ingenuity. The omission of these words from single manuscripts is not wonderful. It finds a parallel, as Alford remarks, in the omission of the words _in Rome_ (Rom. 1:7) from one manuscript, whether from oversight or for the purpose of generalizing the reference of its contents. Nor can any valid objection be drawn from the general character of the epistle. That depended much on the _occasion_ which called it forth, which we have seen to have been general, and the _frame of mind_ in which the apostle wrote. As to the omission of salutations, we shall find upon examination that the measure of Paul's personal acquaintance with the churches was not that of his personal greetings. These abound most of all in the epistle to the Romans whom he had never visited. Rom. 16. They are found also in the epistle to the Colossians to whom Paul was personally a stranger. Col. 4:10-14. On the contrary they are wanting, except in a general form, i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434  
435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

epistle

 

manuscripts

 
omission
 

general

 

omitted

 

churches

 

Ephesus

 

occasion

 

versions

 

apostle


salutations

 
manuscript
 
personal
 

Alford

 
wanting
 

personally

 

stranger

 

generalizing

 

Colossians

 

oversight


reference

 

purpose

 

universal

 

reading

 
ingenuity
 

single

 
parallel
 

contrary

 

wonderful

 

remarks


examination

 
acquaintance
 

called

 

abound

 

objection

 
contents
 

measure

 
Romans
 

depended

 

character


visited

 

hypothesis

 
ground
 

supposed

 

present

 
commentators
 

critical

 
Ellicott
 

intended

 

encyclical