FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073  
2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   >>   >|  
is Excellency to that effect, Cosmo replied, no, nothing but his princely word which he had voluntarily given. Volmar made a similar confession. He, too, declared that he had acted throughout the affair by express command of the Earl of Leicester. Being asked if he had any written evidence of the fact, he, likewise, replied in the negative. "Then his Excellency will unquestionably deny your assertion," said the judges. "Alas, then am I a dead man," replied Volmar, and the unfortunate deacon never spoke truer words. Captain de Maulde also confessed his crime. He did not pretend, however, to have had any personal communication with Leicester, but said that the affair had been confided to him by Colonel Cosmo, on the express authority of the Earl, and that he had believed himself to be acting in obedience to his Excellency's commands. On the 26th October, after a thorough investigation, followed by a full confession on the part of the culprits, the three were sentenced to death. The decree was surely a most severe one. They had been guilty of no actual crime, and only in case of high treason could an intention to commit a crime be considered, by the laws of the state, an offence punishable with death. But it was exactly because it was important to make the crime high treason that the prisoners were condemned. The offence was considered as a crime not against Leyden, but as an attempt to levy war upon a city which was a member of the States of Holland and of the United States. If the States were sovereign, then this was a lesion of their sovereignty. Moreover, the offence had been aggravated by the employment of United States' troops against the commonwealth of the United States itself. To cut off the heads of these prisoners was a sharp practical answer to the claims of sovereignty by Leicester, as representing the people, and a terrible warning to all who might, in future; be disposed to revive the theories of Deventer and Burgrave. In the case of De Maulde the punishment seemed especially severe. His fate excited universal sympathy, and great efforts were made to obtain his pardon. He was a universal favourite; he was young; he was very handsome; his manners were attractive; he belonged to an ancient and honourable race. His father, the Seigneur de Mansart, had done great services in the war of independence, had been an intimate friend of the great Prince of Orange, and had even advanced large sums of money to assis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2049   2050   2051   2052   2053   2054   2055   2056   2057   2058   2059   2060   2061   2062   2063   2064   2065   2066   2067   2068   2069   2070   2071   2072   2073  
2074   2075   2076   2077   2078   2079   2080   2081   2082   2083   2084   2085   2086   2087   2088   2089   2090   2091   2092   2093   2094   2095   2096   2097   2098   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 
Leicester
 

replied

 

Excellency

 

offence

 
United
 
severe
 
prisoners
 

Maulde

 

sovereignty


universal

 
considered
 

affair

 
confession
 

Volmar

 
express
 

treason

 

claims

 

practical

 

answer


member

 
representing
 

Holland

 
condemned
 

Leyden

 

attempt

 
sovereign
 
aggravated
 

employment

 

troops


Moreover

 

lesion

 
commonwealth
 

father

 

Seigneur

 
Mansart
 

honourable

 

ancient

 

handsome

 
manners

attractive

 

belonged

 

services

 

independence

 

advanced

 

intimate

 
friend
 

Prince

 
Orange
 

revive