FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  
-fixing being nothing more than the guess of the men who acted for their own gain. The trial lasted for a month, during which time a great many witnesses were examined--grain men and farmers--and the whole grain trade reviewed. The array of legal talent for the defence was very imposing and the case attracted much attention because, aside from its interest to the grain trade and the farming population, it promised to test the particular and somewhat obscure section of the Criminal Code under which the indictment was laid. At one stage of the proceedings the tension in court became so high and witnesses so unwilling that upon reproval by the court regarding his examination, leading counsel for the Grain Growers picked up his bag and walked out in protest, willing to risk punishment for the breach of etiquette rather than remain. After the Grain Growers' executive and counsel had conferred with the Government, however, the Grain Growers' counsel was prevailed upon to resume the case. The finding of the court did not come as much of a surprise; for it was apparent before the trial ended that the section of the Code was considered ambiguous by the presiding Judge. The latter held that all restraints suggested by the evidence were agreed to, whether justifiably or not, as business regulations and before finding the defendants guilty these restraints must appear to be "undue," according to his reading of the section. It was necessary to respect the right of a particular trade or business or of a particular class of traders to protect their property by regulations and agreements so long as the public interests were not thereby "unduly" impaired; to the Judge's mind there was no question that the public had not been _unduly_ affected. After reviewing the case the Judge held that the gravamen of the whole charge hung upon the Commission Rule of the Exchange--that one cent commission per bushel should be made in handling grain; so that the price paid would be the price at the terminal (Fort William) less the freight and one cent per bushel commission, neither more nor less. Witnesses agreed that this was the lowest profit on which the business could live. Fort William prices were the highest the world's markets could justify. Owing to the presence in the statute of the word, "unduly," therefore, the Judge could not find the defendants guilty. The Grain Growers were much dissatisfied with the decision; for they beli
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Growers
 
section
 
counsel
 
unduly
 

business

 

guilty

 

bushel

 

public

 

commission

 

defendants


regulations

 

finding

 

William

 

agreed

 

restraints

 

witnesses

 

dissatisfied

 
impaired
 
decision
 

interests


gravamen

 

charge

 
reviewing
 

affected

 

question

 

reading

 
respect
 

protect

 

property

 
agreements

traders

 
Commission
 

Exchange

 

fixing

 
profit
 

lowest

 

Witnesses

 

prices

 

highest

 

presence


statute

 
justify
 
markets
 

handling

 

freight

 

terminal

 

examination

 

leading

 

attracted

 
attention