FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526  
527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   >>  
m of "his _great-coat_, leaving only his doublet" (ch. 8), but in the next chapter (9) we find "the victuals had not been touched," though the rascals "searched diligently for booty." Now, if the food was in the great-coat, and the great-coat was stolen, how is it that the victuals remained in Sancho's possession untouched? _Sancho's Wallet_. We are told that Sancho left his wallet by mistake at the tavern where he was blanket-tossed (ch. 5), but in ch. 9, when he found the portmanteau, "he crammed the gold and linen into his wallet."--Pt. I. iii. To make these oversights more striking, the author says, when Sancho found the portmanteau, "he entirely forgot the loss of his _wallet_, his _great-coat_, and of his faithful companion and servant Dapple" (_the ass_). _Supper_. Cervantes makes the party at the Crescent tavern eat two suppers in one evening. In ch. 5 the curate orders in supper, and "after supper" they read the story of _Fatal Curiosity_. In ch. 12 we are told "the cloth was laid [_again_] for supper," and the company sat down to it, quite forgetting that they had already supped.--Pt. I. iv. CHAMBERS'S ENCYCLOPAEDIA states that "the fame of Beaumarchais rests on his two operas, _Le Barbier de Seville_ (1755) and _Le Mariage de Figaro_." Every one knows that Mozart composed the opera of _Figaro_ (1786), and that Casti wrote the libretto. The opera of _Le Barbier de Seville_, or rather _Il Barbiere di Siviglia_, was composed by Rossini, in 1816. What Beaumarchais wrote was two comedies, one in four acts and the other in five acts.--Art. "Beaumarchais." CHAMBERS'S JOURNAL. We are told, in a paper entitled "Coincidences," that Thursday has proved a fatal day with the Tudors, for on that day died Henry VIII., Edward VI., Queen Mary, and Queen Elizabeth. If this had been the case it would, indeed, have been startling; but what are the facts? Henry VIII. died on _Friday_, January 28, 1547, and Elizabeth died on _Monday_, March 24, 1603.--Rymer, _Foedera_, xv. In the same paper we are told with equal inaccuracy that _Saturday_ has been fatal to the present dynasty, "for William IV. and every one of the Georges died on a Saturday." What, however, says history proper? William IV. died on _Tuesday_, June 20, 1837; George I. died _Wednesday_, June 11, 1727; George III. died _Monday_, January 29, 1820; George IV. died _Sunday_, June 26, 1830; and only George II. died on a _Saturday_, "the day [_so_] fatal to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526  
527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   >>  



Top keywords:
Sancho
 

George

 

wallet

 
Saturday
 

supper

 

Beaumarchais

 

victuals

 

portmanteau

 

William

 
Monday

Elizabeth

 

CHAMBERS

 
January
 
Figaro
 

composed

 

Barbier

 

Seville

 

tavern

 

proved

 

Edward


Tudors

 

Siviglia

 

Rossini

 
Barbiere
 

comedies

 

chapter

 
entitled
 

Coincidences

 

JOURNAL

 

Thursday


leaving
 

Tuesday

 

proper

 

Georges

 
history
 

Wednesday

 

Sunday

 

dynasty

 

present

 

Friday


startling

 

inaccuracy

 

doublet

 

Foedera

 

oversights

 

striking

 
author
 

rascals

 
forgot
 

Supper