FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
after suggesting a "fear that Belgium, in spite of its best will, will be in no position to repulse such a largely developed French march without aid," the document adds: It is an imperative duty for the preservation of Germany to forestall this attack of the enemy. The German Government would feel keen regret if Belgium should regard as an act of hostility against herself the fact that the measures of the enemies of Germany oblige her on her part to violate Belgian territory.[90] [Footnote 90: Belgian _Gray Book_, No. 20.] Some hours later, at 1.30 A.M. on August 3d, the German Minister aroused the Belgian Secretary General for the Minister of Foreign Affairs from his slumbers and, asked to see Baron von der Elst. He told him that he was instructed by his Government to inform us that French dirigibles had thrown bombs, and that a patrol of French cavalry, violating international law, seeing that war was not declared, had crossed the frontier. The Secretary General asked Herr von Below where these events had taken place; _in Germany, he was answered_. Baron von der Elst observed that in that case he could not understand the object of his communication. Herr von Below said that these acts, contrary to international law, _were of a nature to make one expect that other acts contrary to international law would be perpetrated by France_.[91] [Footnote 91: Belgian _Gray Paper_, No. 21.] As to these last communications, it should be noted that the German Government, neither then nor at any subsequent time, ever disclosed to the world the "reliable information," which it claimed to have of the intentions of the French Government, and the event shows beyond a possibility of contradiction that at that time France was unprepared to make any invasion of Belgium or even to defend its own north-eastern frontier. It should further be noted that the alleged aggressive acts of France, which were made the excuse for the invasion of Belgium, according to the statement of the German Ambassador himself, _did not take place in Belgium but in Germany_. On August 3d, at 7 o'clock in the morning, Belgium served upon the German Ambassador at Brussels the following reply to the German ultimatum, which, after quoting the substance of the German demand, continued: This note caused profound and painful surprise to the King's
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
German
 

Belgium

 

Belgian

 

Government

 

Germany

 
French
 

France

 

international

 

General

 

Secretary


Minister

 

Footnote

 

August

 

Ambassador

 
invasion
 

frontier

 

contrary

 
claimed
 
information
 

disclosed


reliable
 

unprepared

 
imperative
 

contradiction

 

possibility

 

intentions

 

subsequent

 

suggesting

 

perpetrated

 

expect


preservation

 
communications
 
forestall
 

ultimatum

 

quoting

 

substance

 

served

 

Brussels

 

demand

 

continued


surprise

 

painful

 

profound

 

caused

 
morning
 

aggressive

 

excuse

 
alleged
 
eastern
 

statement