FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
missed Henry and Ainger. _Second_. The Attorney-General wrote a letter denouncing the defendants as thieves and robbers. _Third_. Other letters from Bliss and MacVeagh were published. _Fourth_. Dixon, the foreman of the first jury, was indicted. _Fifth_. Members of the first jury voting "guilty" were in various ways rewarded. _Sixth_. Bargains were made with Boone and Rerdell. The cases against Boone were to be dismissed and Rerdell was promised immunity. Under these circumstances the second trial commenced. But of all the people in this country the citizens of Washington care least for Presidents and members of the Cabinets. They know what these officers are made of. They know that they are simply folks--that they do not hold office forever--that the Jupiters of to-day are often the pygmies of to-morrow. They have seen too many people come in with trumpets and flags and go out with hisses and rags to be overawed by the deities of a day. They have seen Lincoln and they are not to be frightened by his successors. Arthur took part to the extent of turning out men suspected of being friendly to the defence. Arthur was in a difficult place. He was understood to be the friend of Dorsey and, of course, had to do something. Nothing is more dangerous than a friend in power. He is obliged to show that he is impartial, and it always takes a good deal of injustice to establish a reputation for fairness. _Question_. Was there any ground to expect aid or any different action on Arthur's part? _Answer_. All we expected was that Arthur would do as the soldier wanted the Lord to do at New Orleans--"Just take neither side." _Question_. Why did not Brewster speak? _Answer_. The Court would not allow two closings. The Attorney- General did not care to speak in the "middle." He wished to close, and as he could not do that without putting Mr. Merrick out, he concluded to remain silent. The defendants had no objection to his speaking, but they objected to two closing arguments for the Government, and the Court decided they were right. Of course, I understand nothing about the way in which the attorneys for the prosecution arranged their difficulties. That was nothing to me; neither do I care what money they received--all that is for the next Congress. It is not for me to speak of those questions. _Question_. Will there be other trials? _Answer_. I think not. It does not seem likely that ot
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Arthur

 

Question

 

Answer

 

Rerdell

 
people
 

Attorney

 

General

 
defendants
 

friend

 
reputation

fairness

 

action

 
establish
 

injustice

 

expected

 
expect
 

wanted

 
soldier
 

Orleans

 

ground


putting

 

difficulties

 

received

 
arranged
 

prosecution

 

attorneys

 

Congress

 

trials

 

questions

 

understand


Merrick

 

concluded

 

closings

 

middle

 

wished

 

remain

 
silent
 
arguments
 
Government
 

decided


closing
 

objected

 

objection

 

speaking

 

Brewster

 

dismissed

 

promised

 

Bargains

 

guilty

 

rewarded