FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3353   3354   3355   3356   3357   3358   3359   3360   3361   3362   3363   3364   3365   3366   3367   3368   3369   3370   3371   3372   3373   3374   3375   3376   3377  
3378   3379   3380   3381   3382   3383   3384   3385   3386   3387   3388   3389   3390   3391   3392   3393   3394   3395   3396   3397   3398   3399   3400   3401   3402   >>   >|  
e population. Let us suppose that among 5,000,000 of them the young married women were "protected" by the surviving shudder of that ancient Puritan scare--what is M. Bourget going to do about those who lived among the 20,000,000? They were clean in their morals, they were pure, yet there was no easy divorce law to protect them. Awhile ago I said that M. Bourget's method of truth-seeking--hunting for it in out-of-the-way places--was new; but that was an error. I remember that when Leverrier discovered the Milky Way, he and the other astronomers began to theorize about it in substantially the same fashion which M. Bourget employs in his seasonings about American social facts and their origin. Leverrier advanced the hypothesis that the Milky Way was caused by gaseous protoplasmic emanations from the field of Waterloo, which, ascending to an altitude determinable by their own specific gravity, became luminous through the development and exposure--by the natural processes of animal decay--of the phosphorus contained in them. This theory was warmly complimented by Ptolemy, who, however, after much thought and research, decided that he could not accept it as final. His own theory was that the Milky Way was an emigration of lightning bugs; and he supported and reinforced this theorem by the well-known fact that the locusts do like that in Egypt. Giordano Bruno also was outspoken in his praises of Leverrier's important contribution to astronomical science, and was at first inclined to regard it as conclusive; but later, conceiving it to be erroneous, he pronounced against it, and advanced the hypothesis that the Milky Way was a detachment or corps of stars which became arrested and held in 'suspenso suspensorum' by refraction of gravitation while on the march to join their several constellations; a proposition for which he was afterwards burned at the stake in Jacksonville, Illinois. These were all brilliant and picturesque theories, and each was received with enthusiasm by the scientific world; but when a New England farmer, who was not a thinker, but only a plain sort of person who tried to account for large facts in simple ways, came out with the opinion that the Milky Way was just common, ordinary stars, and was put where it was because God "wanted to hev it so," the admirable idea fell perfectly flat. As a literary artist, M. Bourget is as fresh and striking as he is as a scientific one. He says, "Above all,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3353   3354   3355   3356   3357   3358   3359   3360   3361   3362   3363   3364   3365   3366   3367   3368   3369   3370   3371   3372   3373   3374   3375   3376   3377  
3378   3379   3380   3381   3382   3383   3384   3385   3386   3387   3388   3389   3390   3391   3392   3393   3394   3395   3396   3397   3398   3399   3400   3401   3402   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Bourget
 
Leverrier
 
scientific
 

advanced

 

hypothesis

 

theory

 

suspensorum

 
refraction
 

suspenso

 
gravitation

arrested

 

burned

 

Jacksonville

 

Illinois

 
proposition
 

constellations

 

detachment

 

suppose

 

outspoken

 

praises


important

 

contribution

 

locusts

 

Giordano

 
astronomical
 
science
 
erroneous
 

pronounced

 
conceiving
 

inclined


regard

 
conclusive
 
picturesque
 

wanted

 
admirable
 

common

 

ordinary

 

perfectly

 

striking

 

literary


artist

 

opinion

 

England

 
enthusiasm
 

population

 
theories
 

received

 

farmer

 

thinker

 

simple