FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   >>  
ing been the first of the white man's race to behold Niagara than this same Etienne Brule. From his intimacy with Champlain, he must have known--what Champlain knew and had recorded--of the existence of such a waterfall; indeed, it is by no means improbable that many of the details of Champlain's maps (especially those relating to regions which Champlain never saw, but which Brule did visit) were drawn from the latter's descriptions. From his intimacy with Iroquet--Brule spent the better part of eight years in his Country and in that of his allies; being the territory lying to the north of Lake Ontario--he must have known what Iroquet knew of the location of such a waterfall (which was only about 150 miles from the center of his territory, and a journey of that distance was of small moment to the Indians of those days); and when Iroquet went to it as a "trading place," Brule doubtless accompanied him. It must also be remembered that it was this same chief, Iroquet, who later confirmed to Father Daillon the renown of "the great River of the Neutrals"--that is the Niagara--as a Center of Trade; whose location he knew well, but refused to divulge to the Priest. Knowing of such a wonderful waterfall's existence, and its general location; being a "trader," and Niagara being even then a well-known Center of Trade, the probabilities are that Brule visited it at a very early date. A TRADING PLACE But, while white men were no doubt at Niagara early in the 17th Century--possibly as early as 1611--and while we know that Traders and Priests were in its immediate vicinity at various times prior to 1669; and while we have good reason to believe, that in that latter year LaSalle himself explored the whole of the Niagara Frontier; yet it is not until 1678 that we have any positive record of any visit, nor any description of the Cataract by a man who claimed to have actually seen it. Father Hennepin's first work, "Louisiana," published in 1681, tells of that first recorded visit, and gives the first description of Niagara by an eye-witness. At the time when that first unnamed white man saw the Cataract the Indians had, and firmly believed in, at least one positive tradition regarding it; one which had long been believed in by the tribes far and near, and which had long been turned to good account in trade by former generations of Indians who dwelt at Niagara; and which was believed in and maintained for many a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   >>  



Top keywords:
Niagara
 

Champlain

 

Iroquet

 

waterfall

 
location
 
believed
 

Indians

 
description
 

Center

 

Father


territory

 

existence

 
Cataract
 

positive

 
recorded
 
intimacy
 

reason

 

explored

 
Frontier
 

LaSalle


Century

 

possibly

 

vicinity

 
Traders
 

Priests

 
tribes
 

tradition

 

unnamed

 

firmly

 

turned


maintained

 

generations

 
account
 

TRADING

 

witness

 

claimed

 
record
 
Hennepin
 

Louisiana

 

published


allies

 

Country

 

Ontario

 

center

 
journey
 

distance

 
descriptions
 

Etienne

 
behold
 

improbable