FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  
531.25 | 3.76 Sulphur | 127.12 | 15.74 Tin | 459.00 | 4.35 Oxide | 418.75 | 4.77 Zinc | 437.50 | 4.57 Blende | 253.12 | 7.90 Carbonate | 273.12 | 7.32 Silicate | 215.62 | 9.28 Andesite | 165.62 | 12.07 Granite | 162.62 | 12.30 Diabase | 181.25 | 11.03 Diorite | 171.87 | 11.63 Slates | 165.62 | 12.07 Sandstones | 162.50 | 12.30 Rhyolite | 156.25 | 12.80 ============================================ The specific gravity of any particular mineral has a considerable range, and a medium has been taken. The possible error is inconsequential for the purpose of these calculations. For example, a representative gold ore may contain in the main 96% quartz, and 4% iron pyrite, and the weight of the ore may be deduced as follows:-- Quartz, 96% x 12.07 = 11.58 Iron Pyrite, 4% x 6.40 = .25 ----- 11.83 cubic feet per ton. Most engineers, to compensate porosity, would allow twelve to thirteen cubic feet per ton. CLASSIFICATION OF ORE IN SIGHT. The risk in estimates of the average value of standing ore is dependent largely upon how far values disclosed by sampling are assumed to penetrate beyond the tested face, and this depends upon the geological character of the deposit. From theoretical grounds and experience, it is known that such values will have some extension, and the assumption of any given distance is a calculation of risk. The multiplication of development openings results in an increase of sampling points available and lessens the hazards. The frequency of such openings varies in different portions of every mine, and thus there are inequalities of risk. It is therefore customary in giving estimates of standing ore to classify the ore according to the degree of risk assumed, either by stating the number of sides exposed or by other phrases. Much discussion and ink have been devoted to trying to define what risk may be taken in such matters, that is in reality how far values may be assumed to penetrate into the unbroken ore. Still more has been consumed in attempts to coin terms and make classifications which will indicate what ratio of hazard has been taken in stating quantities and values. The old t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
values
 

assumed

 

openings

 

stating

 

estimates

 

sampling

 
standing
 

penetrate

 

distance

 

assumption


geological

 

extension

 

depends

 

calculation

 
hazard
 

quantities

 

development

 

multiplication

 

experience

 

grounds


theoretical
 

results

 

disclosed

 
character
 
deposit
 

tested

 

hazards

 

phrases

 

discussion

 

exposed


degree

 

number

 

devoted

 

unbroken

 

consumed

 

reality

 

define

 
matters
 

classify

 

frequency


varies

 

portions

 
attempts
 
increase
 

points

 

lessens

 
customary
 

giving

 
inequalities
 

classifications