FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  
e perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin; it helps to explain the attitude of unbelief recorded in the Gospels of Christ's brethren, and at the same time requires no distortion of the literalness of the passages in which they are mentioned. There is hardly sufficient evidence to show that first cousins were ever called "brethren." But it would have been quite natural for those who called St. Joseph "the father of Jesus" to call St. Joseph's sons "the brothers of Jesus." And again, the supposition that the Blessed Virgin had no other son, seems strongly supported by the fact that at the crucifixion our Lord commended her to His beloved disciple, and not to one of St. Joseph's family. {225} This theory of St. Epiphanius is much older than the 4th century. It is sometimes urged against it that Origen derived it from the Apocryphal Gospels of the 2nd century, and that its popularity in the Church was owing to Origen's influence. But though the Apocryphal Gospels often contained fictions, we cannot argue that everything in them is fictitious. The tradition agrees with the words of Scripture, and gains support from some fragments of Hegesippus, a cultured Palestinian Christian, born about A.D. 100. He states directly that Symeon, the second bishop of Jerusalem, was the _cousin_ of our Lord, because son of Clopas who was the brother of Joseph. He also calls James "the brother of the Lord," and in another passage speaks of Jude as "called brother" of the Lord. He therefore plainly distinguishes the cousins from the so-called "brethren." We then get the following genealogy:-- Jacob | +--------------------+--------------------+ | | Joseph == Mary Clopas (or Alphaeus) | | | | | +------+------+ +-- James JESUS | | | +-- Joses James Joses Symeon +-- Jude (the Little) +-- Simon +-- Sisters We conclude, therefore, that St. James was the son of St. Joseph. The writer of the Epistle frequently colours his sentences with words from the Old Testament, and assumes a knowledge of it among his readers. He makes no allusion to the Gentiles. He writes in a ton
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Joseph

 
called
 

brother

 

brethren

 

Gospels

 

century

 
Clopas
 
cousins
 

Virgin

 
Symeon

Blessed

 

Apocryphal

 

Origen

 

Jerusalem

 

states

 

directly

 

bishop

 

Hegesippus

 
tradition
 

agrees


Scripture

 

fictitious

 

support

 

Christian

 
Palestinian
 

cultured

 
fragments
 

cousin

 

Epistle

 
frequently

colours

 

writer

 

conclude

 

Little

 

Sisters

 

sentences

 
readers
 

allusion

 

knowledge

 

Testament


Gentiles

 

assumes

 

Alphaeus

 

plainly

 
speaks
 
passage
 

distinguishes

 

writes

 
genealogy
 

sufficient