FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  
way has been denied equality in the Union, it is _not true_. Sweden's only condition, that Norway, as they say, should enjoy her prerogative, has been, that this prerogative in its application should be subordinate to the demands stipulated by the Union, demands which Sweden on her side was quite prepared to submit to. That a right should be maintained under the consciousness that it has its limits in necessary obligatory respects, has been almost lost sight of by Norway. The chief impetus of the Revolution has been a reckless desire on the part of the Norwegians to be absolutly their own masters, that and nothing else. Norway has bragged about her prerogatives without any feeling of responsibility, like an unreasoning whimsical child. It must be _declared_, both on historical and psychological grounds, that it can never be politically _defended_. Norway must already have made the discovery that the great era of universal politics, is entitled, if ever, _to political action under a strict sense of responsibility_. [Sidenote: _Faults on Sweden's side._] By this it is by no means our intention to deny that Sweden herself is to a certain extent to blame for things going as they have done. Looking back over the Union Policy of Sweden, it must, in the first place, be noticeable that there has been, to a certain extent, a lack of firmness and authority. And it cannot either be denied that there have been mistakes that have unnecessarily roused opposition. For instance, in the so-called Stadtholder question, in the sixties, Sweden's policy was undoubtedly too harsh. But whatever faults may be laid at the door of the Union Policy of Sweden, when the Swedish nation in these days tries to make a searching self examination, opinions are not little likely to be unanimous because Sweden has been _too conciliatory_ towards Norways' demands. [Sidenote: _Swedish opinion._] It is said that a foreigner recently travelling in the Scandinavian countries made the observation that Swedes always spoke kindly of the Norwegians, and the Norwegians always spoke ill of the Swedes. The observation doubtless contains a good deal of truth. It is, at least, true that Swedish public opinion, at large, has been distinguished by kindliness both to Norway and its people, and that every honest effort to smooth discussions has had the sympathy of an overwhelming majority of the people of Sweden. Swedes have been very unwilling to listen to the p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Sweden

 
Norway
 
Swedish
 

demands

 
Swedes
 
Norwegians
 
responsibility
 

opinion

 

observation

 

Sidenote


people
 

Policy

 

prerogative

 

denied

 
extent
 
faults
 

nation

 

instance

 

mistakes

 
unnecessarily

roused
 

firmness

 

authority

 

searching

 
opposition
 

sixties

 

policy

 
undoubtedly
 

question

 
Stadtholder

called
 

countries

 

distinguished

 

kindliness

 

honest

 
public
 

effort

 

smooth

 

unwilling

 
listen

majority

 

overwhelming

 

discussions

 

sympathy

 
unanimous
 

conciliatory

 

examination

 
opinions
 

Norways

 

kindly