FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342  
343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   >>  
re should be created, etc." So ran the opening sentence of the Home Rule Bill of 1893. The words I have italicized are harmless but superfluous. They have never appeared in the Constitutions granted to Colonies, even at periods when the Colonies were most distrusted. Nothing can impair the supreme authority of Parliament. EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY. In all parts of the Empire, power emanates from the Sovereign, and is wielded locally in his name. Section 9 of the British North America Act of 1867 runs as follows: "The Executive Government and authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen." Similar words are used in the South Africa Act of 1909, and in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900. Curiously enough, these were Acts to legalize the Federation, or Union, of separate Colonies, and were passed at a time when the principle embodied needed no affirmation. In earlier Acts for granting Colonial Constitutions, the principle was taken for granted, and implied in numerous provisions, but not stated explicitly. The most recent unitary Constitution, that of the Transvaal (Section 47), was even more reticent, though the principle was none the less clear. The point is unimportant, and the words used in the Home Rule Bills of 1886 and 1893 (Clauses 5 and 7 respectively), modified to meet a change of Sovereign, will serve very well: "The Executive power in Ireland (or the Executive Government of Ireland) shall continue vested in His Majesty...." Thereon follow the provisions for delegation of the Royal authority, first to the Sovereign's personal Representative in Ireland, and then through him to the members of the Irish Executive. The simpler these provisions are, the better. What we know as responsible government has never been defined in any Act of Parliament. The phrase "responsible government" has only once appeared in any Constitution--namely, in the preamble of the Transvaal Constitution granted in 1906, and even then no attempt was made at definition, though certain sections, like certain sections in the Australian Constitutions of 1855 and in the later Federal Acts, inferentially suggested features of responsible government. The system is two-sided. Ministers are responsible on the one hand to the King direct, as in Great Britain, or to the King's Representative, as in the Colonies, and, on the other hand, to the elected Legislature. Ireland will resemble
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342  
343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   >>  



Top keywords:

Colonies

 

Executive

 

responsible

 
Constitution
 
Ireland
 

Constitutions

 
granted
 

government

 

authority

 

provisions


Sovereign
 

principle

 

Government

 

vested

 

Section

 
sections
 

appeared

 

Transvaal

 

Representative

 
continue

Parliament

 
delegation
 

follow

 

Thereon

 

unimportant

 

personal

 

Britain

 
Majesty
 

Legislature

 

change


resemble

 

modified

 

elected

 

Clauses

 

definition

 

attempt

 

preamble

 

Ministers

 

system

 

inferentially


suggested

 

Federal

 

Australian

 

features

 

simpler

 

direct

 
phrase
 

defined

 

members

 

stated