FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  
er project comes to nothing, but both hunter and hunted find pleasure in the chase while it lasts. When Mrs. D. returns to the Deputy at the end, her motive for reassuming his yoke is a sound one-- she's out of funds; and her advice to him, "If you'd check my Rambling, loose my Reins," is sound Wycherleyan sense. It must be admitted that when one compares the dialogue of _Hampstead Heath_ with that of the _Act_ some punches are shown to have been pulled in the revision.[4] While keeping the play comic Baker still did not wish to push the audience too far. In December, 1708 he made his fourth and (as it proved) final try for fame and fortune in the theatre with _The fine Lady's Airs,_ He claims that it was well received (see Dedication) and he had his third night, but D'Urfey, whose enmity Baker had incurred, says (Pref. to _The Modern Prophets_) that the play was "hist," and _The British Apollo_, which carried on a feud with Baker in August and September of 1709, makes the same assertion in several places.[5] This, to be sure, is testimony from enemies. But obviously the play was far less liked than _Tunbridge-Walks_ had been, and thus (to compare a small man with a great one) Baker's experience was something like Congreve's, when, after the great success of _Love for Love, The Way of the World_ won only a tepid reception. And it is chiefly Congreve whom he takes for his model; the play is an attempt at a level of comedy higher than Baker had aimed at before. He does not always succeed: Congreve's kind of writing was not natural to Baker, and the lines sometimes labor. Still, the Bleinheim-Lady Rodomont duel has merit; and Sir Harry Sprightly (though of course he owes something to Farquhar's Wildair), Mrs. Lovejoy, and Major Bramble are all in Baker's best manner. On the whole it was a better play than the audience in 1708 deserved. Presumably Baker felt this, for he wrote no more for the stage. Most of the account of Baker's life pulled together in the DNB article on him has a decidedly apocryphal ring to it. The statement (first made in _The Poetical Register_, 1719) that he was "Son of an Eminent Attorney of the City of London" sounds like something manufactured out of whole cloth by a compiler who in fact had no idea whose son Baker was. The _Biographia Dramatica_ had "heard" that the effeminate Maiden in _Tunbridge-Walks_ was absolutely, and without exaggeration, a portrait of the author's own former cha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Congreve
 

audience

 

pulled

 

Tunbridge

 

success

 

experience

 
Sprightly
 
reception
 
Rodomont
 

succeed


comedy

 

Farquhar

 

higher

 
writing
 

Bleinheim

 

chiefly

 

attempt

 

natural

 

compiler

 

manufactured


sounds

 

Eminent

 

Attorney

 

London

 
Biographia
 

author

 

portrait

 

exaggeration

 
Dramatica
 

effeminate


Maiden

 

absolutely

 
Register
 

deserved

 
Presumably
 

manner

 

Lovejoy

 

Bramble

 
apocryphal
 

statement


Poetical
 
decidedly
 

article

 

account

 

Wildair

 

August

 
dialogue
 

compares

 

Hampstead

 

admitted