FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
John Quinn was a dangerous man, for: 1. He was a thief, for: (1) The Illinois state courts found him guilty of robbing a bank, for: a) See _Ill. Court Reports_, Vol. X., p. 83. The brief, then, is a concise, logical outline of everything that the speaker wishes to say to the audience. Its purpose is to indicate in the most definite form every step through which the hearers must be taken in order that the proposition may at last be fully accepted by their experience. The brief is for the debater himself. He does not show it to the audience. It is the framework of his argument. It is the path which, if carefully marked out, will lead to success. Now, as we have seen, there are three principal steps in debating: 1. Making clear what you wish the audience to believe. 2. Showing the audience why the establishing of certain issues should make them believe this. 3. Proving these issues. The first two of these steps constitute what in the brief is called the _Introduction_. The third step, proving the issues, is the largest part of the brief and is called the _Body_ or the _Proof_. In addition to these two divisions of the brief there is a sort of formal summary at the end called the _Conclusion_. The skeleton of a brief then would be as follows: INTRODUCTION In which: (1) the desired end is made clear; (2) the issues are determined. PROOF In which the issues are stated as declarations or assertions and definite reasons are given why each one should be believed. These reasons are in turn supported by other reasons until the assertion is finally brought within the hearers' experience. CONCLUSION In which the proof is summarized. Of course no two briefs are identical, but all must follow this general plan. Suppose we look at what might be called a model brief. MODEL BRIEF Statement of proposition. INTRODUCTION I. Definition of terms. II. Restatement of question in light of these terms. III. Determination of issues. 1. Statement of what both sides admit. 2. Statement of what is irrelevant. IV. Statement of the issues. PROOF I. The first issue is true, for: 1. This reason, which is true, for: (1) This reason, for: a) This reason. b) This reason. 2. This reason, for: (1) This evidence. (2) This authority. (3) This testimony, for: a)
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
issues
 

reason

 

audience

 

Statement

 
called
 
reasons
 

proposition

 
hearers
 

INTRODUCTION

 

experience


definite

 

desired

 
declarations
 

assertions

 
stated
 
determined
 

divisions

 

irrelevant

 
summary
 

addition


Conclusion

 

formal

 

authority

 
evidence
 

skeleton

 
testimony
 

supported

 

general

 

Suppose

 

Determination


follow

 

identical

 
question
 

Restatement

 

Definition

 

assertion

 
finally
 
believed
 

brought

 

briefs


CONCLUSION

 

summarized

 

speaker

 

wishes

 
outline
 

concise

 
logical
 

purpose

 
Illinois
 

courts