FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740  
741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   >>   >|  
er before that incident. Yet the idea had several times presented itself to him, and he had deliberated on it--for that we have facts, witnesses, and his own words. I confess, gentlemen of the jury," he added, "that till to-day I have been uncertain whether to attribute to the prisoner conscious premeditation. I was firmly convinced that he had pictured the fatal moment beforehand, but had only pictured it, contemplating it as a possibility. He had not definitely considered when and how he might commit the crime. "But I was only uncertain till to-day, till that fatal document was presented to the court just now. You yourselves heard that young lady's exclamation, 'It is the plan, the program of the murder!' That is how she defined that miserable, drunken letter of the unhappy prisoner. And, in fact, from that letter we see that the whole fact of the murder was premeditated. It was written two days before, and so we know now for a fact that, forty-eight hours before the perpetration of his terrible design, the prisoner swore that, if he could not get money next day, he would murder his father in order to take the envelope with the notes from under his pillow, as soon as Ivan had left. 'As soon as Ivan had gone away'--you hear that; so he had thought everything out, weighing every circumstance, and he carried it all out just as he had written it. The proof of premeditation is conclusive; the crime must have been committed for the sake of the money, that is stated clearly, that is written and signed. The prisoner does not deny his signature. "I shall be told he was drunk when he wrote it. But that does not diminish the value of the letter, quite the contrary; he wrote when drunk what he had planned when sober. Had he not planned it when sober, he would not have written it when drunk. I shall be asked: Then why did he talk about it in taverns? A man who premeditates such a crime is silent and keeps it to himself. Yes, but he talked about it before he had formed a plan, when he had only the desire, only the impulse to it. Afterwards he talked less about it. On the evening he wrote that letter at the 'Metropolis' tavern, contrary to his custom he was silent, though he had been drinking. He did not play billiards, he sat in a corner, talked to no one. He did indeed turn a shopman out of his seat, but that was done almost unconsciously, because he could never enter a tavern without making a disturbance. It is true that after
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740  
741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

prisoner

 
written
 

talked

 

murder

 

contrary

 

planned

 

silent

 

premeditation

 

presented


pictured

 
tavern
 
uncertain
 

shopman

 
signature
 
unconsciously
 

diminish

 

signed

 

carried

 

circumstance


conclusive

 

stated

 

committed

 

disturbance

 

making

 

custom

 

formed

 

Metropolis

 

desire

 
evening

Afterwards

 

impulse

 
weighing
 

drinking

 

premeditates

 
corner
 

taverns

 
billiards
 

design

 
contemplating

possibility

 

considered

 

moment

 
conscious
 

firmly

 

convinced

 
commit
 

document

 

attribute

 
incident