FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
nted him from writing "The Wonderful Visit." Artists should feel, and if necessary be told, that they are on their honour to do their best. That will do. If they flatter themselves that they are messengers from the Father of Light whenever they put pen to paper, they are apt to take any emotional hubble-bubble in themselves as a sign that the Spirit has been brooding upon the waters, and pour out; though a short time afterwards they may let loose a spate flowing in a quite different direction. Sincerity of the moment is not sincerity; those who have watched England's prime minister know that. William James helped me to wash the bad taste of Mr. Wells's god out of my mouth. It seems remarkable that such a distinguished man of talent--if he were dead, one would be justified in saying a man of genius--should not have been able to invent a more attractive and potent Deity. Voltaire, while making no definition, did better than that; but Voltaire was a much cleverer man than Wells, and he had an education such as no modern writer has. When Mr. Wells preaches, he becomes a bore. Who, except the empty-minded, or those who, like the Athenians, are always seeking new things, can take Mr. Wells's dogmatisms seriously? Is it not in one of his "Sermones" that Horace tells us that the merchant wants to be a sailor and the sailor a merchant? Does he not begin with--_Qui fit, Maecenas?_ But Horace says nothing of the authors of fiction--Stevenson calls them very lightly "_filles de joie_,"--who insist on being boldly and brutally theologians and philosophers. Horace might have invented a better god than Wells; but he had too much good taste and too much knowledge of man in the world to attempt it. The more one reads of the very moderns, the more one falls in love with the ancients. Take the peerless Horatius Flaccus, for instance. Do you think anybody would read his Odes and Epodes and love him as we do if he insisted that we should "sit under him" and assumed a pulpit manner? This is as near as he ever comes to teaching us anything: _Lenit albescens animos capillus Litium et rixae cupidos protervae; Non ego hoc ferrem calidus juventa, Consule Planco._ Even Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton, who loved himself very much, showed in his translations of "The Odes and Epodes" that he could almost love something as well as himself. It does not become me to recommend books
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:
Horace
 

Epodes

 

merchant

 
sailor
 

Voltaire

 

moderns

 

attempt

 

invented

 
Artists
 
knowledge

instance

 

Flaccus

 

Horatius

 

philosophers

 

ancients

 

peerless

 

boldly

 

authors

 

fiction

 
Maecenas

Stevenson
 

insist

 
brutally
 

lightly

 

filles

 

theologians

 

writing

 
Edward
 
Bulwer
 

Lytton


Planco
 

Consule

 

ferrem

 

calidus

 

juventa

 

recommend

 

showed

 

translations

 

manner

 

pulpit


assumed

 

Wonderful

 

insisted

 
teaching
 

cupidos

 

protervae

 

Litium

 

capillus

 

albescens

 

animos