t torment me;--you teaze me, indeed,
sometimes.'
"'Ay, so I do, Dr. Johnson, and I wonder you bear with my nonsense.'
"'No, Madam, you never talk nonsense; you have as much sense, and
more wit, than any woman I know!'
"'Oh,' cried Mrs. Thrale, blushing, 'it is my turn to go under the
table this morning, Miss Burney!'
"'And yet,' continued the Doctor, with the most comical look, 'I have
known all the wits, from Mrs. Montagu down to Bet Flint!'
"'Bet Flint,' cried Mrs. Thrale; 'pray who is she?'
"'Oh, a fine character, Madam! She was habitually a slut and a
drunkard, and occasionally a thief and a harlot.'
"'And, for heaven's sake, how came you to know her?'
"'Why, Madam, she figured in the literary world, too! Bet Flint wrote
her own life, and called herself Cassandra, and it was in verse. So
Bet brought me her verses to correct; but I gave her a half-a-crown,
and she liked it as well.'
"'And pray what became of her, Sir?'
"'Why, Madam, she stole a quilt from the man of the house, and he had
her taken up: but Bet Flint had a spirit not to be subdued; so when
she found herself obliged to go to jail, she ordered a sedan chair,
and bid her footboy walk before her. However, the boy proved
refractory, for he was ashamed, though his mistress was not.'
"'And did she ever get out of jail again, Sir?'
"'Yes, Madam; when she came to her trial, the judge acquitted her.
"So now," she said to me, "the quilt is my own, and now I'll make a
petticoat of it."[1] Oh, I loved Bet Flint!'
"Bless me, Sir!' cried Mrs. Thrale, 'how can all these vagabonds
contrive to get at _you_, of all people?'
"'Oh the dear creatures!' cried he, laughing heartily, 'I can't but
be glad to see them!'"
[Footnote 1: This story is told by Boswell, roy. 8vo, edit. p. 688.]
Madame D'Arblay's notes (in her Diary) of the conversation and mode
of life at Streatham are full and spirited, and exhibit Johnson in
moods and situations in which he was seldom seen by Boswell. The
adroitness with which he divided his attentions amongst the ladies,
blending approval with instruction, and softening contradiction or
reproof by gallantry, gives plausibility to his otherwise paradoxical
claim to be considered a polite man.[1] He obviously knew how to set
about it, and (theoretically at least) was no mean proficient in that
art of pleasing which attracts
"Rather by deference than compliment,
And wins e'en by a delicate dissent."
[Footn
|