FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334  
335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   >>   >|  
s follows: "Much of the graver dialogue, especially in the first two Acts, reminds the reader, in taste of composition, in rhythm, and in a certain quaintness of expression, of _The Two Gentlemen of Verona_. The comic part is spirited and laugh-provoking, yet it consists wholly in the exposure of a braggart coxcomb,--one of the most familiar comic personages of the stage, and quite within the scope of a boyish artist's knowledge of life and power of satirical delineation. On the other hand, there breaks forth everywhere, and in many scenes entirely predominates, a grave moral thoughtfulness, expressed in a solemn, reflective, and sometimes in a sententious brevity of phrase and harshness of rhythm, which seem to me to stamp many passages as belonging to the epoch of _Measure for Measure_, or of _King Lear_. We miss, too, the gay and fanciful imagery which shows itself continually, alike amidst the passion and the moralizing of the previous comedies." I have elsewhere observed at some length[20] on the Poet's diversities of style, marking them off into three periods, severally distinguished as earlier, middle, and later styles. Outside of the play itself, we have in this case no help towards determining at what time the revisal was made, or how long a period intervened between this and the original writing. To my taste, the better parts of the workmanship relish strongly of the Poet's later style,--perhaps I should say quite as strongly as the poorer parts do of his earlier. This would bring the revisal down to as late a time as 1603 or 1604: which date accords, not only with my own sense of the matter, but with the much better judgment of the critics I have quoted. I place the finished _Hamlet_ at or near the close of the Poet's middle period; and I am tolerably clear that in this play he discovers a mind somewhat more advanced in concentrated fulness, and a hand somewhat more practised in sinewy sternness, than in the finished _Hamlet_. I will quote two passages by way of illustrating the Poet's different styles as seen in this play. The first is from the dialogue of Helena and the King, in Act ii., scene 1, where she persuades him to make trial of her remedy: [20] Page 190 of this volume. "The great'st Grace lending grace, Ere twice the horses of the Sun shall bring Their fiery torcher his diurnal ring; Ere twice
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334  
335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
strongly
 

revisal

 
period
 

Hamlet

 

passages

 

dialogue

 
Measure
 

rhythm

 
middle
 
styles

earlier

 

finished

 

matter

 

accords

 

original

 
writing
 

workmanship

 

intervened

 

relish

 

poorer


remedy

 

persuades

 
volume
 

torcher

 
diurnal
 

lending

 
horses
 

Helena

 

discovers

 
advanced

tolerably
 

quoted

 

critics

 

concentrated

 

fulness

 

illustrating

 

sinewy

 

practised

 

sternness

 

judgment


artist

 

boyish

 

knowledge

 
familiar
 
personages
 

satirical

 

delineation

 

scenes

 

predominates

 
breaks