FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757  
758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   >>   >|  
There was also an association in Maryland and other States. "The name of the New York association was not changed but in November, 1917, a new one called the American Constitutional League, was formed. The reason for the change was that the question so far as the constitution of New York was concerned had been settled by vote and agitation was being pressed with vigor in Congress for the proposal by that body of a National Suffrage Amendment. This league is still in existence (1920). It was active in opposing the adoption of the Federal Amendment, was heard before committees of Congress and afterwards before committees of the Legislatures opposing ratification. It is national in its scope and has members in fifteen States. "When it was announced that the Legislature of West Virginia had passed a resolution ratifying the Federal Amendment, the league presented to Secretary of State Colby the evidence that it had not been legally adopted. This evidence he declared he had no power to consider but was bound by any certificate he might receive from the Secretary of West Virginia. The league also urged upon him that under the constitution of Tennessee, when the Legislature was called in extra session it had no power to ratify the amendment. This evidence he also declined to consider. Thereupon a suit was brought in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to restrain him from issuing the proclamation of ratification. The ground was taken that the proposed amendment was not within the amending power of Article V of the National Constitution; that its first ten amendments form a Bill of Rights which can only be changed by the unanimous consent of all the States. It was contended that it was essential to a republican form of government that the States should have the right to regulate and determine the qualifications for suffrage for the election of their own officers and that the guarantee in the National Constitution of a republican form of government would be violated if this amendment should be held to be valid. The bill was dismissed in the Supreme Court on several grounds, partly technical, and the decree was affirmed in the District Court of Appeals apparently on the ground that the proclamation of ratification was not final. An appeal from this decree is now pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. All this litigation has been conducted by the American Constitutional League. "The New York headquart
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757  
758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 
league
 

Amendment

 

National

 

ratification

 
evidence
 

Supreme

 

amendment

 

Secretary

 

opposing


Congress

 

Federal

 
called
 

American

 
Constitutional
 

ground

 

proclamation

 

Virginia

 

District

 

changed


League

 
association
 

constitution

 

Constitution

 
Legislature
 

decree

 
republican
 

committees

 
government
 
consent

unanimous

 
amending
 
Article
 

proposed

 

restrain

 
issuing
 
Rights
 

amendments

 

Appeals

 

apparently


affirmed
 

technical

 

grounds

 
partly
 

appeal

 

litigation

 

conducted

 

headquart

 

United

 

pending