have Kwai Hemm, who swallows the sacred Mantis insect. He is
killed, and all the creatures whom he has swallowed return to light. Such
stories occur among Australians, Kaffirs, Red Men, in Guiana, in
Greenland, and so on. In some cases, among savages. Night (conceived as
a person), or one star which obscures another star, is said to 'swallow'
it. Therefore, I say, 'natural phenomena, explained on savage
principles, might give the data of the swallowing myth, of Cronos'
{37}--that is, the myth of Cronos may be, probably is, originally a
nature-myth. 'On this principle Cronos would be (ad hoc) the Night.'
Professor Tiele does not allude to this effort at interpretation. But I
come round to something like the view of Kuhn. Cronos (ad hoc) is the
midnight [sky], which Professor Tiele also regards as one of his several
aspects. It is not impossible, I think, that if the swallowing myth was
originally a nature-myth, it was suggested by Night. But the question I
tried to answer was, 'Why did the Greeks, of all people, tell such a
disgusting story?' And I replied, with Professor Tiele's approval, that
they inherited it from an age to which such follies were natural, an age
when the ancestors of the Greeks were on (or under) the Maori stage of
culture. Now, the Maoris, a noble race, with poems of great beauty and
speculative power, were cannibals, like Cronos. To my mind, 'scientific
exactitude' is rather shown in confessing ignorance than in adding to the
list of guesses.

Conclusion as to Professor Tiele

The learned Professor's remarks on being 'much more my ally than my
opponent' were published before my Myth, Ritual, and Religion, in which
(i. 24, 25) I cited his agreement with me in the opinion that 'the
philological method' (Mr. Max Muller's) is 'inadequate and misleading,
when it is a question of discovering the origin of a myth.' I also
quoted his unhesitating preference of ours to Mr. Max Muller's method (i.
43, 44). I did not cite a tithe of what he actually did say to our
credit. But I omitted to quote what it was inexcusable not to add, that
Professor Tiele thinks us 'too exclusive,' that he himself had already,
before us, combated Mr. Max Muller's method in Dutch periodicals, that he
blamed our 'songs of triumph' and our levities, that he thought we might
have ignorant camp-followers, that I glided over important questions
(bees, blood-drops, stars, Melian nymphs, the phallus of Ouranos, &c.)