rth Britain, and
might be shown in the "British" division fully displayed; but, says
this contention, which I have called "Scheme A," no "British"
specimens shall be mounted with nest and young!
Being "foreign," it should also come in the "Foreign" division. What,
then, can this teach? Either the bird must be repeated in all three
divisions, or it must, according to the foregoing, appear only in the
"local" division, thus acting an ornithological lie, and leading the
unlearned to believe that it is a very rare bird, peculiar only to
Leicestershire. These examples might be repeated ad nauseam. The
sparrow, the swallow, the kingfisher, the heron, the wild duck, the
wood-pigeon, the pheasant, the coot, the woodcock, the terns, the
gulls, etc, are some common forms which occur to me.
Again, there are five orders of birds not represented in
Leicestershire, nor in England even. These contain nearly five hundred
species. Are these to be entirely eliminated from the collection? or
does it teach anything to put cards in the "Local" or "British"
divisions of the parrot cases to say that no parrots occur (out of
cages) in either Leicestershire or Britain? Again, what can this
teach?
Well, we will take a representative group--say, the order Gallinae, or
game-birds, and, taking our own county of Leicestershire as an
example, we shall find that, although there are nearly four hundred
species of this order known, but eleven at the very outside are
claimed as having occurred in Britain, whilst but three of these are
commonly found in the county. I give their names and values under each
heading:
LOCAL.
BRITISH.
FOREIGN.
Ptarmigan
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Red Grouse
Has occurred.
Yes.
Yes.[Footnote: Formerly indigenous to Britain, but now found in
Sweden, etc.]
Capercaillie
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Black Grouse
Has occurred.
Yes.
Yes.
Pheasant
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Red-legged Partridge
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Barbary Partridge
Said to have once occurred
Doubtful.
Yes.
Partridge
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Virginian Colin
No.
Doubtful.
Yes.
Quail
Has occurred.
Yes.
Yes.
Andalusian Hemipode
No.
Doubtful.
Yes.
Or, putting it into a tabular form, as if supposing that the whole
four hundred known species could be shown, we should have it presented
thus: ORDER--GALLINAE.
(400 SPECIES.)
389
. . . . . . . .400
FOREIGN.
8 . . . .
. . . .
|