oment I
am not able to answer in a manner satisfactory to myself.
XXXI
INVESTIGATIONS FOLLOWING THE CIVIL WAR
In the years 1865, '66 and '67 three important subjects of inquiry were
placed in the hands of committees of which I was a member.
The Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives by
resolutions adopted respectively the 9th and 30th days of April, 1866,
was directed "to inquire into the nature of the evidence implicating
Jefferson Davis and others in the assassination of Mr. Lincoln."
James M. Ashley of Ohio introduced a resolution for the impeachment of
President Johnson, and on the 7th day of January, 1867, the House
authorized the Committee on the Judiciary "to inquire into the official
conduct of Andrew Johnson, Vice-President of the United States,
discharging the powers and duties of President of the United States,"
etc.
By a resolution of the two Houses of Congress passed the 12th and 13th
of December, 1865, a joint committee was created under instructions to
"inquire into the condition of the States which formed the so-called
Confederate States of America and report whether they or any of them
are entitled to be represented in either House of Congress."
William Pitt Fessenden was chairman on the part of the Senate and
Thaddeus Stevens was chairman of the part of the House. Upon the
death of Mr. Stevens I succeeded to his place. The testimony taken
in these cases fills three huge volumes. No inconsiderable part of the
testimony was taken by myself, and I was but seldom absent from the
meetings of the committees.
JOHN WILKES BOOTH
In no other situation in life is the character of a man more fully and
truthfully brought into view than when he is placed upon the witness-
stand and subjected to an examination by counsel or others who aim to
support opposite opinions and to reach adverse results. The committees
that conducted the investigations were composed of men who entertained
opposite views in regard to the reconstruction of the government and in
regard to the impeachment of President Johnson. There was also a
difference of opinion upon the question of the responsibility of the
Confederate authorities for the assassination of Mr. Lincoln. As a
consequence of this diversity of opinion the witnesses were subjected
to the equivalent of a cross-examination in a court of justice. Some
of the impressions of men that I received in the many hearings, and
some of the opinio
|