lier Ramsay indicating Templar origin of
Freemasonry, but making no mention of upper degrees.
1738. Duc d'Antin becomes Grand Master of French Freemasonry in the
place of Lord "Harnouester."
1738. Frederick, Crown Prince of Prussia, initiated into Masonry at
Brunswick.
1740. Voltaire pays his first visit to Frederick, now King.
1741. Baron von Marschall arrives in Paris with a plan for reviving
the Templar Order.
Templar degrees first heard of in France under name of "Scots
Masonry."
1743. Arrival in France of Baron von Hundt with fresh plans for
reviving the Templar Order.
Degree of Knight Kadosch celebrating vengeance of Templars said
to have been instituted at Lyons.
1750. Voltaire goes to spend three years with Frederick.
1751. Templar Order of the Stricte Observance founded by von Hundt.
1754. Rite of Perfection (early form of Scottish Rite) founded in
France.
1761. Frederick acknowledged head of Scottish Rite.
" Morin sent to found Rite of Perfection in America.
1762. Grand Masonic Constitutions ratified in Berlin.[409]
It will be seen then that what Mr. Gould describes as "the flood of
Templarism," which both he and Mr. Tuckett attribute to the so-called
Scots Masons,[410] corresponds precisely with the decline of Jacobite
and the rise of German influence. Would it not therefore appear probable
that, except in the case of the Rose-Croix degree, the authors of the
upper degrees were not Scotsmen nor Jacobites, that Scots Masonry was a
term used to cover not merely Templarism but more especially German
Templarism, and that the real author and inspirer of the movement was
Frederick the Great? No, it is significant to find that in the history
of the _Ordre du Temple_, published at the beginning of the nineteenth
century, Frederick the Great is cited as one of the most distinguished
members of this Order in the past,[411] and the Abbe Gregoire adds that
he was "consecrated" at Remersberg (Rheinsberg?) in 1738, that is to say
in the same year that he was initiated into Masonry at Brunswick.[412]
There is therefore a definite reason for connecting Frederick with
Templarism at this date.
I would suggest, then, that the truth about the Templar succession may
be found in one of the two following theories:
1. That the documents produced by the _Ordre du Temple_ in the
nineteenth centu
|