FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>  
ct involved is now _Aphidius testaceipes_. The systematist who studies only dried corpses will soon be out of date."[22] [Footnote 22: F.M. Webster, of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, in _Science_, April 12, 1912, p. 565.] IV Now all this is not given to intimate that there is no scientific justification for the term "species," but to make plain to my non-professional readers what every well-informed biologist already knows, namely, that at the present time the "species question" is still in a very unsatisfactory state. The facts given above would strongly suggest that there probably is indeed such a thing as a species, in the sense assigned by Linnaeus, who as we have seen wished to make it a designation covering all the descendants of each distinct kind originally created. But this original aim of Linnaeus is to-day not merely ignored but treated with lofty contempt; for according to the prevailing theories of evolution, all the manifold diversities of life in our modern world have come about gradually as the result of a slow development by natural process, and hence it would be vain beyond measure to attempt to determine the limits of a "species" in the sense understood by Linnaeus. But we may conclude, from the facts presented above, that if there is such a naturally delimited group as a "species" in the Linnaean sense of the word, it by no means coincides with what now passes under this name, but might include many so-called species, often a whole genus, or even several. With this in mind, we must pass on to consider the next step in our study, as to whether new "species" are now coming into being in our modern world under scientific observation, either natural or artificial. VI MENDELISM AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES "Had Mendel's work come into the hands of Darwin, it is not too much to say that the history of the development of evolutionary philosophy would have been very different from that which we have witnessed."[23] [Footnote 23: William Bateson, "Mendel's Principles of Heredity," p. 316.] I From the latter part of the eighteenth century, attempts were continually being made to explain the origin of all organic forms by some system of development or evolution. Buffon had dwelt on the modifications directly induced by the environment. Lamarck had made much use of this idea, claiming that such modifications were transmitted to posterity, and claiming the same for the structura
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>  



Top keywords:

species

 

development

 
Linnaeus
 

natural

 

evolution

 
modern
 

scientific

 

Mendel

 

claiming

 
modifications

Footnote

 
observation
 

MENDELISM

 

coming

 

artificial

 
include
 

passes

 

Linnaean

 

coincides

 

called


Darwin
 

organic

 
origin
 

system

 

explain

 

continually

 

eighteenth

 
century
 

attempts

 

Buffon


transmitted
 
posterity
 

structura

 
directly
 

induced

 

environment

 

Lamarck

 

history

 
ORIGIN
 
SPECIES

evolutionary

 

philosophy

 

Principles

 

Heredity

 
Bateson
 

William

 

witnessed

 

present

 
biologist
 

readers