t must be about the 27th or 28th of February I think, but the
newspaper will prove the date; it might be the first or second of March,
I cannot speak to that.
_Q._ Was it not after the 11th of March?
_A._ I cannot state indeed.
_Q._ It was given to you the day before it appeared in the Morning
Chronicle?
_A._ It was the day before, about three o'clock.
_Mr. Gurney._ Look at that (_shewing a pamphlet to the witness_) have
you received one of those pamphlets either from Mr. Cochrane Johnstone,
Lord Cochrane, or Mr. Butt?
_A._ Lord Cochrane gave me one of those at my own request, hearing it
was published.
_Q._ Look at that which purports to be an affidavit of Lord Cochrane.
_Mr. Serjeant Best._ Is that the identical book Lord Cochrane gave you?
_A._ No.
_Mr. Gurney._ Read the affidavit and tell me whether you know that to be
verbally and precisely the same?
_Mr. Serjeant Best._ I submit to your Lordship that will not do.
_Mr. Gurney._ Where is your copy of the pamphlet?
_A._ It is at home.
_Mr. Gurney._ Will your Lordship allow him to go home and fetch it.
_Lord Ellenborough._ Certainly.
_Mr. Malcolm Richardson called again._
_Examined by Mr. Gurney._
_Q._ You are a bookseller?
_A._ Yes.
_Q._ Were you employed by Mr. Butt to publish that pamphlet?
_A._ Not absolutely employed by him to publish it, but I sold it for him
at his request, he wrote to me to know whether I would sell it for him.
_Lord Ellenborough._ This should be a publication by Lord Cochrane, to
make the affidavit evidence against him.
_Mr. Gurney._ Certainly, my Lord, and if my learned friends wish it, I
will wait till the witness comes back.
_Mr. Serjeant Best._ I have no wish to lay any impediment in the way,
therefore if your Lordship thinks there is no impropriety in my
permitting it to be read now, I will do it?
_Lord Ellenborough._ I leave it to your judgment, whether your
resistance does you more good than the admission.
_Mr. Serjeant Best._ I will not resist it certainly. If I had the
original I would deliver it up in a moment, but the fact is, we have not
the original.
_The Affidavit was read as follows:_
"Having obtained leave of absence to come to town, in
consequence of scandalous paragraphs in the public papers, and
in consequence of having learnt that hand-bills had been
affixed in the streets, in which (I have since seen) it is
asser
|