FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>  
" But Mic-mac? "O, Mic-mac all same as Ulnookh." The latter word strictly means Indian-man, and cannot be applied to a white. Mic-mac is the name of their tribe, and, they insist upon it, always has been. Again, Kanata is said to be an Iroquois word, and, consequently, not likely to have been in use amongst a tribe of the Lenape family, which the Mic-macs are. It does not appear that we have any authority for supposing the country was ever called Canada by the Indians themselves. It is curious enough that as Canada was said to derive from an exclamation, "Aca nada!" so the capital has been made to take its name from another; "Quel bec!" cried one of Champlain's Norman followers, on beholding Cape Diamond. As in the former case, however, so in this, we have evidence of more probable sources of the name, which I will enumerate as briefly as possible. The first, and a very probable one, is the fact, that the strait between Quebec and St. Levi side of the river, was called in the Algonquin language "Quebeio," _i. e._ a narrowing,--a most descriptive appellation, for in ascending the river its breadth suddenly diminishes here from about two miles to fourteen or fifteen hundred yards from shore to shore. The little river St. Charles, which flows into the St. Lawrence on the northern side of the promontory, is called in the Indian language (Algonquin?) Kabir or Koubac, significant of its tortuous course, and it is from this, according to La Potherie, that the city derives its name of Quebec. Mr. Hawkins, in his _Picture of Quebec, &c., 1834_, denies the Indian origin of the word, since, as he says, there is no analogous sound to it in any of their languages; and he assumes a Norman origin for it on the strength of "Bec" being always used by the Normans to designate a promontory in the first place; and secondly, because the word Quebec is actually found upon a seal of the Earl of Suffolk, of historical celebrity temp. Hen. V. and VI., which Mr. Hawkins supposes to have been the name of some town, castle, or barony in Normandy. Such are the pros and cons, upon which I do not presume to offer any opinion; only I would observe, that if there are no analogous sounds in the Indian languages, whence come Kennebec and other similar names? A. C. M. Exeter. Surely in the "inscription on a seal (1420), in which the Earl of Suffolk is styled 'Domin_e_ [?] de Hamburg et de Quebec,'" the last word must be a misprint for _Lube
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>  



Top keywords:

Quebec

 

Indian

 

called

 

languages

 
analogous
 

Suffolk

 

Canada

 

Norman

 

promontory

 

Algonquin


language

 

Hawkins

 

origin

 
probable
 
Normans
 
designate
 

assumes

 

strength

 

celebrity

 

historical


Ulnookh

 

applied

 

Picture

 
derives
 

Potherie

 

strictly

 
denies
 
Exeter
 

Surely

 
inscription

similar
 

styled

 
misprint
 

Hamburg

 
Kennebec
 

Normandy

 

barony

 
castle
 

supposes

 

presume


sounds

 
observe
 

opinion

 

significant

 
Diamond
 

followers

 

beholding

 

evidence

 
enumerate
 

briefly