FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656  
657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   >>   >|  
ef, but I think the most experienced observers will agree that such expressions, if habitual, tend to diminish and not to increase the just influence of the lawyer. There was never a weightier advocate before New England juries than Daniel Webster. Yet it is on record that he always carefully abstained from any positiveness of assertion. He introduced his weightiest arguments with such phrases as, "It will be for the jury to consider," "The Court will judge," "It may, perhaps, be worth thinking of, gentlemen," or some equivalent phrase by which he kept scrupulously off the ground which belonged to the tribunal he was addressing. The tricks of advocacy are not only no part of the advocate's duties, but they are more likely to repel than to attract the hearers. The function of the advocate in the court of justice, as thus defined and limited, is tainted by no insincerity or hypocrisy. It is as respectable, as lofty, and as indispensably necessary as that of the judge himself. In my opinion, the two most important things that a young man can do to make himself a good public speaker are: First. Constant and careful written translations from Latin or Greek into English. Second. Practice in a good debating society. It has been said that all the greatest Parliamentary orators of England are either men whom Lord North saw, or men who saw Lord North--that is, men who were conspicuous as public speakers in Lord North's youth, his contemporaries, and the men who saw him as an old man when they were young themselves. This would include Bolingbroke and would come down only to the year of Lord John Russell's birth. So we should have to add a few names, especially Gladstone, Disraeli, John Bright, and Palmerston. There is no great Parliamentary orator in England since Gladstone died. I once, a good many years ago, studied the biographies of the men who belonged to that period who were famous as great orators in Parliament or in Court, to find, if I could, the secret of their power. With the exception of Lord Erskine and of John Bright, I believe every one of them trained himself by careful and constant translation from Latin or Greek, and frequented a good debating society in his youth. Brougham trained himself for extemporaneous speaking in the Speculative Society, the great theatre of debate for the University of Edinburgh. He also improved his English style by translations from the Greek, among which is hi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656  
657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
advocate
 

England

 

Gladstone

 

Bright

 

belonged

 

translations

 
careful
 

society

 

debating

 

English


Parliamentary
 

trained

 

public

 
orators
 
Russell
 
speakers
 

conspicuous

 
greatest
 

contemporaries

 

include


Bolingbroke

 

Palmerston

 

translation

 

constant

 

frequented

 
Brougham
 

extemporaneous

 
exception
 

Erskine

 

speaking


Speculative

 

improved

 

Edinburgh

 

Society

 
theatre
 

debate

 
University
 

orator

 

Disraeli

 

secret


Parliament

 

famous

 

studied

 
biographies
 

period

 
phrases
 
arguments
 

weightiest

 
positiveness
 
assertion