[Footnote 229: Forney, Anecdotes of Public Men, I, p. 52.]
[Footnote 230: Polk, MS. Diary, Entry for June 22, 1846.]
[Footnote 231: Polk, MS. Diary, Entry for June 23, 1846.]
[Footnote 232: Even the Alton _Telegraph_, a Whig paper, and in times
past no admirer of Douglas, spoke (May 30, 1846) of the "most
admirable" speech of Judge Douglas in defense of the Mexican War (May
13th).]
[Footnote 233: The official returns were as follows:
Douglas 9629
Vandeventer 6864
Wilson 395
]
[Footnote 234: The Abolitionist candidate in 1846 showed no marked
gain over the candidate in 1844; Native Americanism had no candidates
in the field.]
[Footnote 235: Polk, MS. Diary, Entry for September 4, 1846.]
[Footnote 236: _Globe_, 29 Cong., 2 Sess., pp. 13-14.]
[Footnote 237: Polk, MS. Diary, Entry for December 14, 1846.]
[Footnote 238: Ford, History of Illinois, p. 390.]
[Footnote 239: Polk, MS. Diary, Entry for January 6, 1847.]
[Footnote 240: Forney, Anecdotes of Public Men, I, pp. 146-147.]
[Footnote 241: _Globe_, 30 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 92.]
[Footnote 242: _Globe_, 30 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 222.]
[Footnote 243: _Globe_, 32 Cong., 2 Sess., App., p. 172.]
[Footnote 244: The debate is reported in the _Globe_, 30 Cong., 1
Sess., App., pp. 500 ff.]
[Footnote 245: _Globe_, 30 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 506.]
[Footnote 246: _Ibid._, p. 507.]
CHAPTER VII
THE MEXICAN CESSION
When Douglas entered Washington in the fall of 1847, as junior Senator
from Illinois, our troops had occupied the city of Mexico and
negotiations for peace were well under way. Perplexing problems
awaited Congress. President Polk sternly reminded the two Houses that
peace must bring indemnity for the past and security for the future,
and that the only indemnity which Mexico could offer would be a
cession of territory. Unwittingly, he gave the signal for another
bitter controversy, for in the state of public opinion at that moment,
every accession of territory was bound to raise the question of the
extension of slavery. The country was on the eve of another
presidential election. Would the administration which had precipitated
the war, prove itself equal to the legislative burdens imposed by that
war? Could the party evolve a constructive programme and at the same
time name a candidate that would win another victory at the polls?
It soon transpired that the Democratic party was at
|