FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   >>   >|  
336: Cutts, Constitutional and Party Questions, p. 195. There is so much brag in this account that one is disposed to distrust the details.] [Footnote 337: Sanborn, Congressional Grants, pp. 31-34.] [Footnote 338: _Globe,_31 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 904. The vote was 26 to 14.] [Footnote 339: _Ibid._, p. 1838.] [Footnote 340: Sanborn, Congressional Grants, p. 35.] [Footnote 341: John Wentworth, in his _Congressional Reminiscences_, hints at some vote-getting in the East by tariff concessions; but Douglas insisted that it was the Chicago branch, promising to connect with Eastern roads, which won votes in New York, Pennsylvania and New England. See Illinois _State Register_, March 13, 1851. The subject is discussed by Sanborn, Congressional Grants, pp. 35-36.] [Footnote 342: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 853.] [Footnote 343: _Ibid._, p. 869.] [Footnote 344: The economic significance of the Illinois Central Railroad appears in a letter of Vice-President McClellan to Douglas in 1856. The management was even then planning to bring sugar from Havana directly to the Chicago market, and to take the wheat and pork of the Northwest to the West Indies _via_ New Orleans.] [Footnote 345: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 365.] [Footnote 346: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 366.] [Footnote 347: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., pp. 369-370.] [Footnote 348: _Globe,_ 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 370.] [Footnote 349: _Ibid._] [Footnote 350: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 371. I have italicized one phrase because of its interesting relation to the Kansas-Nebraska Act.] [Footnote 351: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., App., p. 373.] [Footnote 352: Stephens, Const. View of the War between the States, II, pp. 178 ff.] [Footnote 353: For an account of this interesting episode, see Stephens, War Between the States, II, pp. 202-204. Boyd, not McClernand, was chairman of the House Committee, but the latter introduced the bills by agreement with Richardson.] [Footnote 354: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., pp. 662, 757.] [Footnote 355: See Sheahan, Douglas, pp. 132-134. See also Douglas's speech in the Senate, Dec. 23, 1851, and the testimony of Jefferson Davis, _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 1830.] [Footnote 356: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 1115.] [Footnote 357: _Ibid._, p. 1116.] [Footnote 358: _Globe_, 31 Cong., 1 Sess., pp. 1134-1135.] [Footnote 359: _Ibid._, p. 1135.] [Footnote 360: _Ibi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
Congressional
 

Douglas

 

Grants

 

Sanborn

 

interesting

 
Stephens
 
Chicago
 

Illinois

 
account

States

 

Indies

 

Orleans

 

relation

 

Kansas

 

phrase

 

italicized

 

Nebraska

 
Committee
 

testimony


Jefferson

 

Senate

 

speech

 

Sheahan

 
McClernand
 

chairman

 
episode
 

Between

 

Richardson

 
agreement

introduced

 

letter

 

Reminiscences

 

Wentworth

 

promising

 

connect

 
Eastern
 

branch

 

tariff

 

concessions


insisted

 

Questions

 

Constitutional

 

disposed

 
distrust
 
details
 

management

 

McClellan

 
President
 

planning