FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  
itled to insist that a duty should be laid on foreign corn when imported, sufficient fully to countervail the excess of burdens laid upon the land." [15] Speech, pp. 9, 10. Now for the "_Sliding Scale_." "I just here repeat the opinion which I have declared here before, and also in the House of Commons, that I cannot consent to substitute a fixed duty of 8s. a-quarter on foreign corn, for the present ascending and descending scale of duties. I prefer the principle of the ascending and descending scale, to such an amount of fixed duty. And when I look at the burdens to which the land of this country is subject, I do not consider the fixed duty of 8s. a-quarter on corn from Poland, and Prussia, and Russia, where no such burdens exist, a sufficient protection for it."[16] [16] Do. p. 8. Again-- "If you disturb agriculture, and divert the employment of capital from the land, you may not increase your foreign trade--for that is a thing to dwell under existing circumstances--_but will assuredly reduce the home trade, by reducing the means to meet the demand_, and thus permanently injure yourselves also."[17] [17] Do. p. 13. Again-- "I have come to the conclusion, that the existing system of an ascending and descending scale of duties, should not be altered: and that, moreover, we should as much as possible make ourselves independent of a foreign supply--and not disturb the principle of the existing corn-laws--of these corn-laws, which, when you have an abundance of your own, exclude altogether the foreign supply--and when the price rises in this country, freely admits it."[18] [18] Speech, p. 15. Again--he quoted the following remarkable language of Lord Melbourne on the 11th June 1840-- "_Whether the object be to have a fixed duty, or an alteration as to the ascending and descending scale, I see clearly and distinctly, that that object will not be carried without a most violent struggle--without causing much ill-blood, and a deep sense of grievance--without stirring society to its foundations, and leaving behind every sort of bitterness and animosity. I do not think the advantages to be gained by the change are worth the evils of the struggle_."[19] [19] Do. p. 18. And Sir Robert Peel concluded the foregoing summary of his views, on the great questions then proposed to the country for its decision, in the following words:-- "I ask your free suffrages, with thi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205  
206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
foreign
 

descending

 

ascending

 
burdens
 
existing
 
country
 

principle

 

object

 

supply

 

disturb


struggle
 
duties
 

sufficient

 

Speech

 

quarter

 

Melbourne

 

Whether

 

distinctly

 

carried

 

alteration


decision
 

altogether

 

exclude

 
suffrages
 

freely

 
remarkable
 
proposed
 

quoted

 

admits

 

language


violent

 

leaving

 
Robert
 
foundations
 

bitterness

 
advantages
 

change

 

animosity

 

abundance

 

society


stirring

 

causing

 
gained
 

questions

 
foregoing
 
concluded
 

grievance

 

summary

 
present
 

prefer