FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  
gs after the internecine party strife. C4.9. This again is a district Xenophon is well acquainted with. Has he one eye on the old insurrection against Persia, _tempore_ Histiaeus, and another on the new arrangements, _tempore_ Antalcidas? C4.12-13. Croesus and his bills of lading. Some humour. It also brings out the archic man in opposition to the shop-keeper man of the mere business type. But still the bills of lading are needed. Croesus only doesn't "twig" the right persons to check. It's the opposition between Despot and true Ruler. C5.9. Cyrus has an idea, the nature of which we shall discover later. C5.15. Belshazzar's feast, _vide_ Daniel, cf. Hdt. Why plural, "the trenches"? Is Xenophon obscure? His obscurity is mostly this: he expects his reader intelligently to follow him. C5.32. Jars somewhat on our feelings, perhaps, in its thirst for revenge: but cf. the feeling against the assassins of Lord Frederick Cavendish and Mr. Burke. [Written at the time of the Phoenix Park murders.] C5.37. Is a turning-point in the rise of the archic man (and yet hardly yet, but at C5.58 we shall come to bodyguards and eunuchs). At this highest pinnacle of {arkhe} Cyrus desires to furnish himself as befits a king. It is an historical difficulty which Xenophon has to get over or round, or is Xenophon himself in the same condemnation, so to speak? Does he also desire his archic man to be got up in a manner befitting royalty at a certain date? Consider. C5.42-47. These sections pose the difficulty well, and it is a difficulty, and no mistake. C5.42 ff. Xenophon-Hellenic theory of life. The leisure to invite one's own soul and see one's friends which is needed to make life worth living, versus _negotia_, _negotia_, _negotia_. How far are we to be consciously self-regarding? Cyrus versus Buddha. The Hellenic hero is not equal to absolute non-self-regarding devotion to mere work. The Buddha might be. C5.48. Perhaps nothing is cleverer in the neat and skilful mosaic work of this composition than the fitting-in here of Artabazus' personal view with the--at last necessary--impersonal or public theory of leadership. It is pretty also that Artabazus should at length get his reward, and humorous that he doesn't, after all, get it in the old form. C5.49 ff. He keenly remembers each tantalizing moment of approach and separation. A splendid speech of the humorous type. Xenophon himself must be credited with so much fun, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Xenophon

 

archic

 

difficulty

 

negotia

 
Buddha
 
needed
 

Artabazus

 

Hellenic

 

versus

 

theory


humorous

 
tempore
 

Croesus

 

opposition

 
lading
 

friends

 
keenly
 
sections
 
mistake
 

remembers


leisure

 

invite

 
royalty
 

condemnation

 

moment

 
approach
 

desire

 

befitting

 
manner
 
tantalizing

Consider
 

mosaic

 
speech
 
composition
 

skilful

 

length

 

cleverer

 

fitting

 
pretty
 

impersonal


leadership

 
personal
 

Perhaps

 

consciously

 

public

 

living

 

credited

 

reward

 

separation

 

splendid