FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>  
teresting aspect of the question. How did these civilisations develop in Asia, and how is it that they have remained stagnant for ages, while Europe advanced? The origin of the Asiatic civilisations is obscure. The common idea of their vast antiquity has no serious ground. The civilisation of Japan cannot be traced back beyond about the eighth century B.C. Even then the population was probably a mixed flotsam from neighbouring lands--Ainus, Koreans, Chinese, and Malays. What was the character of the primitive civilisation resulting from the mixture of these different cultures we do not know. But the chief elements of Japanese civilisation came later from China. Japan had no written language of any kind until it received one from China about the sixth century of the Christian Era. The civilisation of China itself goes back at least to about 2300 B.C., but we cannot carry it further back with any confidence. The authorities, endeavouring to pick their steps carefully among old Chinese legends, are now generally agreed that the primitive Chinese were a nomadic tribe which slowly wandered across Asia from about the shores of the Caspian Sea. In other words, they started from a region close to the cradle of western civilisation. Some students, in fact, make them akin to the Akkadians, who founded civilisation in Mesopotamia. At all events, they seem to have conveyed a higher culture to the isolated inhabitants of Western Asia, and a long era of progress followed their settlement in a new environment. For more than two thousand years, however, they have been enclosed in their walls and mountains and seas, while the nations of the remote west clashed unceasingly against each other. We need no other explanation of their stagnation. To speak of the "unprogressiveness" of the Chinese is pure mysticism. The next generation will see. The civilisation of India is also far later than the civilisation of the west, and seems to be more clearly due to borrowing from the west. The primitive peoples who live on the hills about India, or in the jungles, are fragments, apparently, of the Stone Age inhabitants of India, or their descendants. Their culture may have degenerated under the adverse conditions of dislodgement from their home, but we may fairly conclude that it was never high. On these primitive inhabitants of the plains of India there fell, somewhere about or before 1000 B.C., the Asiatic branch of the Aryan race. A very rec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   >>  



Top keywords:

civilisation

 

Chinese

 

primitive

 

inhabitants

 

century

 

Asiatic

 
culture
 
civilisations
 

Mesopotamia

 

Akkadians


founded

 

nations

 

mountains

 

explanation

 

enclosed

 

clashed

 

unceasingly

 

remote

 

Western

 
isolated

environment

 

settlement

 

progress

 

higher

 

thousand

 

events

 

conveyed

 

fairly

 
conclude
 

dislodgement


conditions

 

degenerated

 

adverse

 

plains

 

branch

 
descendants
 

generation

 

mysticism

 

unprogressiveness

 

jungles


fragments

 
apparently
 

borrowing

 

peoples

 

stagnation

 

agreed

 
neighbouring
 

Koreans

 

Malays

 
flotsam