FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   >>   >|  
i gegessen wird, also dass alles, was das Brot wirkt und leidet, der Leib Christi wirke und leide, dass er ausgeteilt [ge]gessen und mit den Zaehnen zerbissen werde." (St. L. 17, 2052.) Self-evidently, when writing thus, Luther had no Capernaitic eating and drinking in mind, his object merely being, as stated to emphasize the reality of the sacramental union. January [1]0, 1535, however, the day after his return from Cassel, Melanchthon wrote to his intimate friend Camerarius that at Cassel he had been the messenger not of his own, but of a foreign opinion. (_C. R._ 2, 822) As a matter of fact, Melanchthon returned to Wittenberg a convert to the compromise formula of Bucer, according to which Christ's body and blood are truly and substantially received in the Sacrament, but are not really connected with the bread and wine, the signs or _signa exhibitiva_, as Bucer called them. Stating the difference between Luther and Bucer, as he now saw it, Melanchthon said: "The only remaining question therefore is the one concerning the physical union of the bread and body,--and of what need is this question? _Tantum igitur reliqua est quaestio de physica coniunctione panis et corporis, qua quaestione quid opus est?_" (_C. R._ 2, 827. 842; St. L. 17, 2057.) To Erhard Schnepf he had written: "He [Bucer] confesses that, when these things, bread and wine, are given, Christ is truly and substantially present. As for me I would not demand anything further." (_C. R._ 2, 787.) In February he wrote to Brenz: "I plainly judge that they [Bucer, etc.] are not far from the view of our men; indeed in the matter itself they agree with us (_reipsa convenire_); nor do I condemn them." (2, 843; St. L. 17, 2065.) This, however, was not Luther's view. In a following letter Melanchthon said: "Although Luther does not openly condemn it [the formula of Bucer], yet he did not wish to give his opinion upon it as yet. _Lutherus, etsi non plane damnat, tamen nondum voluit pronuntiare_." (_C. R._ 2, 843; St. L. 17, 2062.) A letter of February 1, 1535, to Philip of Hesse and another of February 3, to Bucer, also both reveal, on the one hand, Melanchthon's desire for a union on Bucer's platform and, on the other, Luther's attitude of aloofness and distrust. (_C. R._ 2, 836. 841.) 202. Secret Letters and the Variata of 1540. In the letter to Camerarius of January 10, 1535, referred to in the preceding paragraph, Melanchthon plainly indicates that his views
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448  
449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Melanchthon

 
Luther
 
letter
 

February

 

matter

 

Christ

 

formula

 

January

 

condemn

 

Camerarius


substantially

 
opinion
 

Cassel

 
plainly
 
question
 

confesses

 

written

 

Schnepf

 

Erhard

 

demand


present

 

things

 

Although

 

platform

 

attitude

 
aloofness
 

distrust

 

desire

 

reveal

 
preceding

referred

 

paragraph

 

Secret

 

Letters

 
Variata
 

Philip

 

openly

 
reipsa
 

convenire

 

nondum


voluit
 

pronuntiare

 

damnat

 

Lutherus

 

drinking

 

object

 

eating

 

Capernaitic

 

evidently

 
writing