FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
tions of tenure, to ejectment. Its completeness indicates its usefulness. Partial and occasional depositions in the other cases cited help to round out the picture of the Fair Play "code." For example, the right of settlement included not only the approval of the Fair Play men, but also the acceptance of the prospective landholder by his neighbors. Allusions to this effect are made in the Coldren deposition as well as in the Huff-Latcha case. Eleanor Coldren's deposition, made at Sunbury, June 7, 1797, concerns the disputed title to certain lands of her deceased husband, Abraham Dewitt, opposite the Great Island. Her comments about neighbor approval demonstrate the point. She says, for instance, that ... in the Spring of 1775, Henry Antes and Cookson Long, two of the Fair-Play Men, with others, were at the deponent's house, next below Barnabas Bonner's Improvement, where Deponent's Husband kept a Tavern, and heard Antes and Long say that they (meaning the Fair-Play Men) and the Neighbors of the Settlement had unanimously agreed that James Irvin, James Parr, Abraham Dewitt and Barnabas Bonner should ... have their Improvement Rights fitted.... She speaks of the resolution of the claims problem "as being the unanimous agreement of the Neighbors and Fair-Play Men...."[30] William King, who temporarily claimed part of the land involved in the dispute between Edmund Huff and Jacob Latcha, also refers to neighbor approval in his deposition taken in that case. He said, "I first went to Edmund Huff, then to Thomas Kemplen, Samuel Dougherty, William McMeans, and Thomas Ferguson, and asked if they would accept me as a neighbor...."[31] Land tenure policy is noted by this same William King in the case of _James Grier_ vs. _William Tharpe_. Repeating what we have already pointed out in the case of _Hughes_ vs. _Dougherty_, King testified that "there was a law among the Fair-play men by which any man, who absented himself for the space of six weeks, lost his right to his improvement."[32] In the Huff-Latcha case, King recounts the case of one Joseph Haines who "had once a right ... but had forfeited his right by the Fair-play law...."[33] The forfeiture rule was tempered, however, in cases involving military service. Bratton Caldwell's deposition in _Grier_ vs. _Tharpe_ is a case in point. Caldwell, one of the Fair Play men in 1776, declared that "Greer went into the army in 1776 and was a wa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
William
 
deposition
 

approval

 

neighbor

 

Latcha

 

Caldwell

 

Tharpe

 

Abraham

 

Dewitt

 
Neighbors

Edmund
 

tenure

 

Thomas

 

Dougherty

 

Barnabas

 
Bonner
 

Improvement

 

Coldren

 
Kemplen
 

declared


Samuel

 

McMeans

 

Ferguson

 

recounts

 
temporarily
 

Joseph

 

Haines

 

dispute

 

involved

 

refers


claimed
 
forfeiture
 
testified
 

Hughes

 

pointed

 
tempered
 

absented

 

military

 

improvement

 
policy

accept

 
involving
 

Bratton

 

service

 

Repeating

 
forfeited
 
Tavern
 
Eleanor
 

Sunbury

 
effect