FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336  
337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   >>   >|  
ery often legislates unadvisedly. That the two provinces cannot remain in their present state is acknowledged by all. The question therefore is, can we rationally expect any improvement from their union? Perhaps it may appear presumptuous in me to venture to differ from Lord Durham, who is a statesman born and bred--for this is not a party question in which a difference of politics may bias one: it is a question as to the well-governing of a most important colony, and no one will for a moment doubt that his lordship is as anxious as the Duke of Wellington, and every other well-wisher to his country, to decide upon that which he considers honestly and honourably to be the best. It is really, therefore, with great deference that I submit to him, whether another arrangement should not be well considered, before the union of the two provinces is finally decided upon. His lordship has very truly observed, that in legislating, we are to legislate for futurity; if not, we must be prepared for change. Acting upon this sound principle, we are to legislate upon the supposition that the whole country of Upper and Lower Canada _is_ well peopled. We are not to legislate for the present population, but for the future. And how is this to be done in the present condition of the provinces? Most assuredly by legislating for territory--for the amount of square acres which will eventually be filled up by emigration. I perfectly agree with his lordship in the remark that, "if the Canadians are to be deprived of their representative government, it would be better to do it in a straightforward way;" but I submit that it would be done in a straightforward way by the plan I am about to submit to him, and I consider it more advisable than that of convulsing the two provinces by bringing together two races so inveterate against each other. Instead of a union of the two provinces, I should think it more advisable to separate the Canadas into three: Upper, Lower, and Middle Canada,--the line of demarcation, and the capitals of each Province appearing already to be marked out. The Lower province would have Quebec, and be separated from the Middle province by the Ottawa river. The Middle province would have Montreal, and would extend to a line drawn from Lake Simcoe to Lake Ontario, throwing into it _all the townships on the American side of the St Lawrence_, which would do away with the great objection of the Upper province being depe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336  
337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

provinces

 

province

 
legislate
 

submit

 

question

 
Middle
 
present
 
lordship
 

country

 

advisable


Canada
 

straightforward

 

legislating

 
remark
 
eventually
 
filled
 
square
 

territory

 

assuredly

 
amount

emigration

 

perfectly

 

condition

 

representative

 

government

 
deprived
 

Canadians

 

Canadas

 

Simcoe

 

Ontario


throwing

 

extend

 
Montreal
 

separated

 

Ottawa

 

townships

 

objection

 
Lawrence
 

American

 

Quebec


inveterate

 

Instead

 

convulsing

 

bringing

 

separate

 
appearing
 
marked
 

Province

 

capitals

 

demarcation