FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358  
359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   >>   >|  
jected to this test, 100 grains of Milwaukie wheat lost 12.10 grains. " " Guilderland (Holland) wheat lost 9.35 " " " Polish Odessa red wheat " 10.55 " " " Soft Russian wheat " 8.55 " " " Kobanga wheat " 8.15 " After an exposure of the dried samples to the air for two or three days, they increased in weight from one to three grains in the hundred originally employed. Nineteen different samples of wheat flour, which lost by exposure to the above heat from ten to fourteen grains in the one hundred, when similarly exposed to the air for eighteen hours, again increased in weight from 8.40 to 11.60 in the hundred grains originally employed. These experiments show, what might indeed have been predicted as to the general result, that wheat in grain, if not less liable to injury than flour, yet if once properly dried, suffers much less from a subsequent exposure to air and moisture. It is now ascertained that in presence of a considerable proportion of water, wheat flour under the influence of heat undergoes a low degree at least of lactic fermentation, which will account for the _souring_ of the ordinary samples when exposed to warm or humid climates. The same result will inevitably follow from their careless exposure in the holds of vessels. That this is particularly the case with many of the cargoes of wheat flour shipped to Great Britain, there is little reason to doubt. This may be partly owing to the great humidity of the English climate, as the deterioration is observed as well in the flour which is the produce of that country as in that which is received from abroad. It is stated by Mr. Edlin, quoted in an article on Baking, in the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, that, "as a general rule, the London flour" is decidedly bad. The gluten generally wants the adhesiveness which characterizes the gluten of good wheat." I have observed that, in the analyses of some of the samples of damaged flour, the proportions of what is set down under the head of glucose and dextrine are unusually large. This is perhaps due to the change produced in the starch by the action of diastase, and which may under certain circumstances be formed in wheat flour. It would se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358  
359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

grains

 

samples

 
exposure
 

hundred

 

employed

 
exposed
 
general
 
result
 

weight

 

gluten


observed
 

originally

 

increased

 
country
 
cargoes
 
produce
 
shipped
 

received

 

stated

 
vessels

abroad

 

partly

 

humidity

 

reason

 

deterioration

 
climate
 

English

 

Britain

 

adhesiveness

 

unusually


dextrine

 

glucose

 
change
 

produced

 

formed

 

circumstances

 

starch

 
action
 

diastase

 

proportions


London

 

decidedly

 

Britannica

 

Encyclopaedia

 

article

 
Baking
 
generally
 

analyses

 

damaged

 

careless