FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635  
1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   >>   >|  
e subject. I was as indignant as he. I spoke to M. le Duc d'Orleans, who only knew the matter superficially. I showed him the necessity of thoroughly examining into complaints of this nature; the injustice of allowing these deputies to wear out hope, patience, and life, in the streets of Paris, without giving some audience; the cruelty of suffering honest citizens to languish in dungeons, without knowing why or by what authority they were there. He agreed with me, and promised to speak to the Duc de Noailles. At the first finance council after this, I apprised the Comte de Toulouse, and we both asked the Duc de Noailles when he meant to bring forward the affair of these Perigueux people. He was utterly unprepared for this question, and wished to put us off. I said to him that for a long time some of these people had been in prison, and others had wandered the streets of Paris; that this was shameful, and could not be longer endured. The Comte de Toulouse spoke very firmly, in the same sense. M. le Duc d'Orleans arrived and took his place. As the Duc de Noailles opened his bag, I said very loudly to M. le Duc d'Orleans that M. le Comte de Toulouse and I had just asked M. de Noailles when he would bring forward the Perigueux affair; that these people, innocent or guilty, begged only to be heard and tried; and that it appeared to me the council was in honour bound to keep them in misery no longer. On finishing, I looked at the Comte de Toulouse, who also said something short but rather strong. M. le Duc d'Orleans replied that we could not have done better. The Duc de Noailles began muttering something about the press of business; that he had not time, and so forth. I interrupted him by saying that he must find time, and that he ought to have found it long before; that nothing was so important as to keep people from ruin, or to extricate others from dungeons they were remaining in without knowing why. M. le Duc d'Orleans said a word to the same effect, and ordered the Duc de Noailles to get himself ready to bring forward the case in a week. From excuse to excuse, three weeks passed over. At last I said openly to M. le Duc d'Orleans that he was being laughed at, and that justice was being trodden under foot. At the next council it appeared that M. le Duc d'Orleans had already told the Duc de Noailles he would wait no longer. M. le Comte de Toulouse and I continued to ask him if at last he would bring forward the Perigue
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635  
1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Noailles

 

Orleans

 
Toulouse
 

people

 

forward

 

longer

 

council

 

affair

 

Perigueux

 

excuse


appeared

 
streets
 
dungeons
 

knowing

 
interrupted
 
business
 

important

 

muttering

 

deputies

 

looked


finishing

 

replied

 

strong

 

extricate

 

justice

 

trodden

 

laughed

 

patience

 

openly

 
Perigue

continued

 

passed

 
effect
 

ordered

 

remaining

 
giving
 

honour

 
unprepared
 

authority

 
question

utterly

 

superficially

 

necessity

 
showed
 

wished

 

matter

 
complaints
 

nature

 

injustice

 
promised