FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637  
1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   >>   >|  
ht of the principal points at issue. Seeing that he did not finish, and that he wished to tire us, and to manage the affair in his own way, I interrupted him, saying that the father and the son were two people; that the case in point respected the son alone, and that he had to determine whether an Intendant was authorised or not, by his office, to tax people at will; to raise imposts in the towns and country places of his department, without edicts ordering them, without even a decree of council, solely by his own particular ordonnances, and to keep people in prison four or five months, without form or shadow of trial, because they refused to pay these heavy taxes, rendered still more heavy by expenses. Then, turning round so as to look hard at him, "It is upon that, Monsieur," added I, "that we must decide, since your report is over, and not amuse ourselves with a panegyric upon M. de Basville, who is not mixed up in the case." The Duc de Noailles, all the more beside himself because he saw the Regent smile, and M. le Duc, who looked at me do the same, but more openly, began to speak, or rather to stammer. He did not dare, however, to decide against the release of the prisoners. "And the expenses, and the ordonnance respecting these taxes, what do you do with them?" "By setting the prisoners at liberty," he said, "the ordonnance falls to the ground." I did not wish to push things further just then. The liberation of the prisoners, and the quashing of the ordonnance, were determined on: some voices were for the reimbursement of the charges at the expense of the Intendant, and for preventing him to do the like again. When it was my turn to speak, I expressed the same opinions, but I added that it was not enough to recompense people so unjustly ill-treated; that I thought a sum of money, such as it should please the council to name, ought to be adjudged to them; and that as to an Intendant who abused the authority of his office so much as to usurp that of the King and impose taxes, such as pleased him by his own ordinances, and who threw people into dungeons as he thought fit by his private authority, pillaging thus a province, I was of opinion that his Royal Highness should be asked to make such an example of him that all the other Intendants might profit by it. The majority of those who had spoken before me made signs that I was right, but did not speak again. Others were against me. M. le Duc d'Orleans pro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637  
1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

people

 

Intendant

 
prisoners
 

ordonnance

 

decide

 

thought

 

authority

 

council

 

office

 

expenses


preventing

 
ground
 
voices
 

liberation

 
quashing
 
things
 

determined

 

liberty

 

reimbursement

 

charges


setting

 

expense

 

Intendants

 

Highness

 

pillaging

 

province

 

opinion

 

profit

 

Others

 
Orleans

majority

 

spoken

 
private
 

treated

 

respecting

 
unjustly
 

expressed

 
opinions
 

recompense

 
adjudged

ordinances

 

dungeons

 

pleased

 
impose
 

abused

 

country

 
places
 

department

 

imposts

 
authorised