FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671  
1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   >>   >|  
now read to the Council the act of abrogation, and the rules that were to be observed in future. Then, looking at the Keeper of the Seals, "Monsieur," said he, "you will explain this better than I. Have the goodness to do so before reading the decree." The Keeper of the Seals then spoke, and paraphrased what his Royal Highness had said more briefly; he explained in what manner the Parliament had the right to remonstrate, showed the distinction between its power and that of the Crown; the incompetence of the tribunals in all matters of state and finance; and the necessity of repressing the remonstrances of Parliament by passing a code (that was the term used), which was to serve as their inviolable guide. All this explained without lengthiness, with grace and clearness, he began to read the decree, as it has since been printed and circulated everywhere, some trifling alteration excepted. The reading finished, the Regent, contrary to his custom, showed his opinion by the, praises he gave to this document: and then, assuming the Regent's tone and air he had never before put on, and which completed the astonishment of the company, he added, "To-day, gentlemen, I shall deviate from the usual rule in taking your votes, and I think it will be well to do so during all this Council." Then after a slight glance upon both sides of the table, during which you might have heard a worm crawl, he turned towards M. le Duc and asked him his opinion. M. le Duc declared for the decree, alleging several short but strong reasons. The Prince de Conti spoke in the same sense. I spoke after, for the Keeper of the Seals had done so directly his reading was finished. My opinion was given in more general terms so as not to fall too heavily upon the Parliament, or to show that I arrogated to myself the right to support his Royal Highness in the same manner as a prince of the blood. The Duc de la Force was longer. All spoke, but the majority said but little, and some allowed their vexation to be seen, but did not dare to oppose, feeling that it would be of no use. Dejection was painted upon their faces; it was evident this affair, of the Parliament was not what they expected or wished. Tallard was the only one whose face did not betray him; but the suffocated monosyllable of the Marechal d'Huxelles tore off the rest of the mask. The Duc de Noailles could scarcely contain himself, and spoke more than he wished, with anguish worthy of Fresnes. M.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671  
1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Parliament

 

decree

 
reading
 

opinion

 

Keeper

 

showed

 

wished

 

finished

 

Regent

 

Highness


Council

 
explained
 
manner
 

Noailles

 
general
 
heavily
 

directly

 

worthy

 

anguish

 

Fresnes


turned

 

strong

 

reasons

 

alleging

 

declared

 

scarcely

 

Prince

 

painted

 

evident

 
Dejection

affair

 

betray

 
expected
 

monosyllable

 

Tallard

 
Marechal
 

feeling

 
prince
 

suffocated

 
arrogated

support

 

longer

 

majority

 
oppose
 

Huxelles

 

allowed

 
vexation
 

necessity

 

repressing

 
remonstrances