FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472  
1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   >>   >|  
ection of the constitution and the practice under it, says: Under this authority, the appointment of electors has been variously provided for by the State legislatures. In some States the legislatures have directly chosen the electors by themselves; in others they have been chosen by the people by a general ticket throughout the whole State, and in others by the people in electoral districts fixed by the legislature, a certain number of electors being apportioned to each district. No question has ever arisen as to the constitutionality of either mode, except that of a direct choice by the legislature. But this, though often doubted by able and ingenious minds, has been firmly established in practice ever since the adoption of the constitution, and does not now seem to admit of controversy, even if a suitable tribunal existed to adjudicate upon it.--[2 Story on Constitution, section 1,472. Judge Strong, one of the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, and a member of the electoral commission, in discussing the subject of this section, says: I doubt whether they [the framers of the national constitution] had in mind at all [in adopting this section] the idea of a popular election as a mode of appointing State electors. They used the word _appoint_, doubtless thinking that the legislatures of the States would themselves select the electors, or empower the governor or some other State officer to select them. The word appoint is not the most appropriate word for describing the result of a popular election. Such a mode of appointment, I submit is allowable, but there is little reason to think it was contemplated. * * * It was not until years afterward that the electors were chosen by vote.--[Electoral Commission, p. 252. Senator Frelinghuysen, also a member of the Electoral Commission, thus speaks of the practice in the several States: Under this power [the power given by the section of the national constitution, which we are now considering] the legislature might direct that the electors should be appointed by the legislature, by the executive, by the judiciary, or by the people. In the earliest days of the republic, electors were appointed by the legislatures. In Pennsylvania they were appointed by the judiciary. Now, in all the States except
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472  
1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
electors
 

States

 
legislature
 

legislatures

 

constitution

 

section

 

people

 
appointed
 
practice
 
chosen

Commission
 

select

 

direct

 

Electoral

 

member

 

appoint

 

election

 

popular

 
appointment
 

national


judiciary
 

electoral

 

result

 
submit
 
adopting
 

describing

 

thinking

 

doubtless

 

allowable

 
officer

governor

 

empower

 

appointing

 

Frelinghuysen

 

Pennsylvania

 

republic

 
executive
 

earliest

 

speaks

 

contemplated


reason

 

Senator

 
afterward
 
Constitution
 

constitutionality

 
choice
 

arisen

 

question

 

district

 

firmly