FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474  
1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   >>   >|  
a right to insert in our constitution a provision which controls or destroys a discretion which may be, nay _must_ be, exercised by the legislature in _virtue_ of _powers confided_ to it by the Constitution of the United States. The fourth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States declares that the times, places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives shall be prescribed by the legislature thereof. Here an express provision was made for the manner of choosing representatives by the State legislatures. They have an _unlimited_ discretion on the subject. They may provide for an election in districts sending more than one, or by general ticket for the whole State. Here is a general discretion, a power of choice. What is the proposition on the table? It is to limit the discretion, to leave no choice to the legislature, to compel representatives to be chosen in districts; in other words to compel them to be chosen in a specific manner, excluding all others. Were not this plainly a violation of the constitution? Does it not affect to control the legislature in the exercise of its powers? * * * It assumes a control over the legislature, which the Constitution of the United States does not justify. It is bound to exercise its authority according to its _own view_ of _public policy_ and _principle_; and yet this proposition compels it to surrender all discretion. In my humble judgment * * * it is a direct and palpable infringement of the constitutional provisions to which I have referred.--[Electoral Commission, p. 186. The conclusion seems irresistible that a State constitution cannot determine for the legislature who shall, or shall not, participate in the choice of presidential electors, and that in so far as our State constitution may attempt to do so, it is an infringement of the national constitution. The discretion of the legislature, by virtue of the supreme law of the land, being (except in so far as it is controlled by the national constitution itself) thus absolutely unlimited, it may, without doubt, as I think, authorize all citizens without regard to sex, to participate in the choice of presidential electors. But it has been suggested to me that possibly by the State legislature, as used in the section of the national constitution which we
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474  
1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
legislature
 

constitution

 
discretion
 

choice

 

manner

 

national

 

representatives

 
United
 
States
 
Constitution

districts
 

unlimited

 

virtue

 

general

 

chosen

 

proposition

 

participate

 

presidential

 
compel
 

electors


provision
 

powers

 

infringement

 
control
 
exercise
 

section

 

palpable

 

policy

 

surrender

 
conclusion

direct

 

humble

 

compels

 

Electoral

 

judgment

 

referred

 
Commission
 

principle

 

provisions

 

constitutional


regard

 

citizens

 
authorize
 
possibly
 

suggested

 
absolutely
 

supreme

 

attempt

 

determine

 

public