FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475  
1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   >>   >|  
have been considering, was meant the whole people of the State in whom the legislative power originally resides and not the organized legislative body which they may create. We answer first that the language of the section will not admit of this construction. It clearly recognizes a distinction between the State or the people of the State, and its legislature. The language is not "each State shall appoint in such manner as _it_ may direct," etc., but it is, "each State shall appoint in such manner as the _legislature_ thereof may direct," etc. Again, it is a familiar canon of construction that in determining the meaning of a statute, recourse may be had to the history of the times in which it was enacted. When the Constitution of the United States was framed, all of the States had organized legislatures, or representative bodies who wielded the legislative power, and without doing violence to language, we must suppose that it was to _them_ the constitution referred. Again, the State legislatures are referred to not less than ten times in the national constitution, and in each instance the reference is such as to make it clear that the organized representative bodies are intended, and in article 5 they are, in express terms, distinguished from conventions of the States. Indeed, the fundamental idea of the American government is that of a representative republic as opposed to a pure democracy, and it may well be doubted whether a State government, without a representative legislative body of some kind, would, in the American sense, be republican in form. Finally, it is apparent from the debates in the constitutional convention which framed the constitution, and from the whole plan devised for the election of president and vice-president, that it was not intended by the framers of the constitution to commit directly to the whole people of a State the authority to determine how the presidential electors should be chosen. Nothing seems to have given the convention more trouble than the mode of selecting a president. Many plans were proposed. Chief among these were: election by congress; election by the executives of the States; election by the people; election by the State legislatures; and election by electors. These were presented in many forms. The convention decided not less than three times, and once by a unanimous vote, in favor of election by the national congress, and as often reconsidered it (2 Madison Papers,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475  
1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
election
 

representative

 
States
 

constitution

 

people

 

legislative

 

legislatures

 
convention
 
president
 
organized

language
 

electors

 

bodies

 

American

 

government

 

intended

 

direct

 

national

 
referred
 

framed


appoint
 

construction

 

manner

 
legislature
 
congress
 

presented

 

Madison

 

executives

 

Papers

 
devised

constitutional

 

republican

 

debates

 

decided

 

apparent

 

Finally

 
authority
 

selecting

 

reconsidered

 

doubted


proposed

 

trouble

 
presidential
 
unanimous
 

determine

 
commit
 

directly

 

Nothing

 

chosen

 

framers